Interesting take. Recruiting is done by coaches, not the university. The coach must be the one in charge to be able to assemble the team he envisions. He needs to have "his guy" running football recruiting.
Certainly the school oversees (or should) the recruiting methods, budget, offices, etc for compliance and control. I feel certain this hire was passed by the AD, compliance, and probably Chancellor Plowman because of the ongoing NCAA issues.
I just don't understand thinking recruiting should be "done by the school" rather than the coaches.
I'm under no illusion that relationships are a huge factor in terms of recruiting. I don't agree with a HC being given the keys to all of recruiting. We hired White to oversee the program - he chose CJH. Fine. And, yes, I do hope CJH hires are similarly vetted by the University, starting with White. I'm not overly convinced this has actually been done in the past (at least not recently) ..... and definitely NOT with a comprehensive vision/mission. Emphasis on comprehensive.
In my mind I'm exploring a change in recruiting even in the face of reality. Wouldn't it be nice to be recruited by a VFL like Reggie White, Mayo or even Inky, etc., in
conjunction with the Staff's position coach. The idea being the VFL's on staff stick around, maybe even for years. As we all know coaches get their dream job tomorrow and are gone fast (Kiffin), or get fired. Combine that with the portal - and your exposure to significant turnover gets high. Anyway, the idea is there is continuity from the athlete, to VFL, to the University. It would minimize/lessen the chances of coach bias and separation anxiety of 1:1 relationship ratio.
As I see it, we're not that competitive with Alabama, LSU, Georgia, Clemson, OSU and others in terms of recruiting (and on the field). Yet we're doing it the same way (McDonald's bags aside), without winning and expecting different results. So we're back to the definition of insanity again. Why? To me its a simple matter, UT needs White to have a vision, exert his control because we hired him, not CJH, and look to do something innovative. We need something that will break the ceiling(s) created by the top 4-5 programs that are in the CFP each year. Just doing the same thing as they are ..... IMO .... will not cut it. And, quite frankly, I can say this exact same thing for the vast majority of P5 programs, because they too are trying to break through.