I'd say the journalistic standards of Sports Illustrated are a tad more rigorous than what gets posted on an anonymous message board, so your comparing this article to random threads started here is pretty funny.
It is kind of funny. Although, I'm not convinced that SI's journalistic standards are any better than most of the media's - but I concede the point that its a tad bit higher than this message board.
According to the article, eight guys say they took $$ or benefits from this guy. Okay. I have no problem with that part. Seven say they knew him but declined comment, which raises the question why? But offers no evidence one way or the other. Six people denied all or part of what Luch said. That becomes a question of who do you believe.
What cracks me up is the jump to "all programs are taking $$" kind of mentality.
I guess I'm more incredulous that someone posts something that they read on another site and then that gets repeated over and over again as fact and people go off the deep end. (Not necessarily the SI article in this case, just in general).
Its like the title of this thread, did I miss where Chris Mims and Chuck Webb are among the eight guys who said they took $$? (RIP Chris) But to the casual reader around here, this will be a given from now on - repeated to anyone who will listen and in a short time be "fact" that every informed Vol fan knows.
That, I guess, is what aggravates me. I don't know that it happened or not. Could it? Sure. Is it a fact? Not demonstrated to be based on available evidence.