lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 74,174
- Likes
- 43,812
So because UF "backed" into the title game last year they are "subpar" National Champs?
Actually, prior to the national championship game I'd have said they were only so-so contenders. It was because they utterly crushed a team that many were touting as one of the best in awhile that the '06-'07 Gators have much to brag about.
I mean, think about it. Florida narrowly escaped defeat several times during last year's campaign. They beat UT by a single point and looked pedestrian doing it. They needed three blocked field goals against South Carolina. They got break after break after break. So when they got the nod to go to the big game against a team that had dominated everyone they played, the expectations were low.
Florida trounces tOSU, ergo the conclusioin was that damn that SEC must be tough.
Well, in retrospect, I think the most you can say about last year's Florida team is that they were pretty good. Not great, but good. And the most you can say about tOSU is that they might have been the most overrated major college football team of all time.
This year, the SEC has only one team that is in contention for the national championship and that is LSU. If they manage to eek out a series of victories and win the SECCG, then they stand a decent chance of playing someone like tOSU or even BC, both fo which are teams they ought to beat.
Question is, what would happen if LSU had to play ASU or Oregon? I'm not willing to say this year -- based on last year -- that the SEC team ought to be favored in such a match-up. As much as it pains me to say it, I think Florida's national championship last year, while earned, may not have the value we all thought it did at the time in terms of proving SEC superiority.