Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

[PEPPERJAX]

Were people justified in calling Charlie a scumbag after his death? Or saying he doesn't deserve to be celebrated?

It is time for a Statue!

 

[volbeast33]

View attachment 774576

Charlie Kirk called George Floyd a 'scumbag.' Here's context

Kirk said of Floyd, "This guy was a scumbag. Now, does that mean he deserves to die? That's two totally different things — of course not."

www.snopes.com

 

[luthervol]

Yeah, not really. We all know how it works. 'Look how bad these people are, and they're all one demographic' puts in the listeners' minds that the demographic is bad. That said, I would like to know what led into those comments.

And he was also trying to promote the false premise that if they got the spot because of affirmative action, then they were less qualified than others who were passed over.

 

[volbeast33]

Is affirmative action not part of dei? Something she has admitted being a beneficiary of. Pretty cut and dry.

Yes it is DEI and he stated that they admitted to not having the brain processing power to get it on their own.

 

[KB5252]

Ok this is him being political commentator. I haven't watched any of those videos. What I've watched are the more organic back and forth on college campuses.

To his statements, I hate he used the word white people in referring to them taking someone else's place.. That isn't his MO in his organic back and forth on campuses. That's where he was good imo, If these comments are standard for this format I'd have to say it's not something I would watch or agree with any regularity.

I'll add to this with what I've heard him say elsewhere. He's for a system where color shouldn't play any part. And I can agree with that in general. For instance I've heard him argue that many of the DEI efforts are based on the idea that some young people from underprivileged areas don't have the same resources and that can hold education back, and those who show promise and determination should be given a chance

My retort to that would be that rural and other poor predominantly white areas face those same challenges. is it fair or equitable to deny them equal opportunities solely based on the color of their skin?

There's valid points to be made all around

 

[luthervol]

It is time for a Statue!

Next to the golden trump idol would be perfect. Put them in Mara Largo and let it be a trumpers' Mecca.
Every Jan. 6th we could have pilgrimages of thousands kneeling at the shrine.
Get chill bumps just thinking about it.

 

[volbeast33]

I saw where MO spoke in defense of Affirmative Action but not where she said she benefited from it. Even if she did, CK shouldn't have denigrated her intellect, glass houses and all.

It’s a podcast. He feels that anyone that has to use DEI principles is someone that can’t succeed on their own. He believes in merit and doesn’t feel like race should be taken into account. CK says that we should build communities up instead of lowering standards.

 

[volbeast33]

so heres the full quote

Kirk made the statement in reference to Floyd's alleged criminal history and the circumstances surrounding his death. Kirk's exact words were: "I am also going to offer some context and some nuance about the death of George Floyd that no one dares to say out loud. Which is that this guy was a scumbag. Now, does that mean he deserves to die? That's two totally different things — of course not."

Nobody shares more misinformation than Huff.

 

[luthervol]

It’s a podcast. He feels that anyone that has to use DEI principles is someone that can’t succeed on their own. He believes in merit and doesn’t feel like race should be taken into account. CK says that we should build communities up instead of lowering standards.

I wonder if he believed it was ever inequitable.
If so, I wonder if he believed it was currently equitable.
If so, I wonder when he believed it became equitable.

 

[Gandalf]

Were people justified in calling Charlie a scumbag after his death? Or saying he doesn't deserve to be celebrated?

Justified? Hell no! But they should absolutely be free to do so in America.

But as all the libs tell me - freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

 

[MOOOOONEY]

To this same point politicians knelt at his casket, the Democrat party knelt in traditional African garments to celebrate George Floyd and people who made despicable comments were cancelled and fired from their jobs.

Some of the very things the left is decrying now.

What have we learned?

Tragedies bring out the best and worst in humanity.

George Floyd killed - cities burned, businesses looted and destroyed, innocent people killed.

Charlie Kirk killed - prayer vigils held throughout the world.

 

[Wireless1]

Next to the golden trump idol would be perfect. Put them in Mara Largo and let it be a trumpers' Mecca.
Every Jan. 6th we could have pilgrimages of thousands kneeling at the shrine.
Get chill bumps just thinking about it.

This post could come back to haunt you.

 

[luthervol]

so heres the full quote

Kirk made the statement in reference to Floyd's alleged criminal history and the circumstances surrounding his death. Kirk's exact words were: "I am also going to offer some context and some nuance about the death of George Floyd that no one dares to say out loud. Which is that this guy was a scumbag. Now, does that mean he deserves to die? That's two totally different things — of course not."

And he followed it with..........................
After that comment, Kirk listed a series of accusations about Floyd's background, criminal history and cause of death — all with varying degrees of legitimacy. The Associated Press, reporting on the event, described that section of the speech as "an avalanche of aspersions and debunked claims about Floyd."

CK calls him a scumbag and then spews forth a bunch of bs to support his stance. (maybe racist?)

 

[luthervol]

Justified? Hell no! But they should absolutely be free to do so in America.

But as all the libs tell me - freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

So was CK more justified in calling George Floyd a scumbag than were those who called CK a scumbag.

 

[OrangeTsar]

All of his nonsense he spewed about the LGTBQ community, and minorities. Trying to pit people against them. It’s well known knowledge. Now replace LGTBQ with white people and minorities with heterosexual men, and have a democrat saying it you’d be saying the exact thing I am saying.

Again, “actual quotes” please, not just the endlessly repeated talking point slop peddled on MSNBC.

 

[OrangeTsar]

So was CK more justified in calling George Floyd a scumbag than were those who called CK a scumbag.

Actually, people called Kirk a “fascist” and a “Nazi”. We all have many people we know that we consider to be scumbags. But unlike literal “Nazis” no one is advocating for the death of scumbags.
Heck, I am sure we all each have people in our lives who consider us to be scumbags. I know some people surely view me as one

 

[C-south]

And he was also trying to promote the false premise that if they got the spot because of affirmative action, then they were less qualified than others who were passed over.

False premise? That’s exactly why affirmative action exists. To put people in positions based on something other than merit.

 

[luthervol]

False premise? That’s exactly why affirmative action exists. To put people in positions based on something other than merit.

Wrong

 

[volbeast33]

I wonder if he believed it was ever inequitable.
If so, I wonder if he believed it was currently equitable.
If so, I wonder when he believed it became equitable.

I’m not 100% sure. It’s a debate style podcast. You don’t have to agree with him and was welcome to debate him. I don’t know why people get so upset.

 

[C-south]

Wrong

Then there’s nepotism and cronyism. I bet you know what that is.

 

[Rickyvol77]

And he followed it with..........................
After that comment, Kirk listed a series of accusations about Floyd's background, criminal history and cause of death — all with varying degrees of legitimacy. The Associated Press, reporting on the event, described that section of the speech as "an avalanche of aspersions and debunked claims about Floyd."

CK calls him a scumbag and then spews forth a bunch of bs to support his stance. (maybe racist?)

You don’t think Floyd was a scumbag?

 

[OrangeTsar]

I wonder if he believed it was ever inequitable.
If so, I wonder if he believed it was currently equitable.
If so, I wonder when he believed it became equitable.

I find it interesting that you used the term equitable instead of referring to equality. Equity means ensuring the same outcomes while equality means having the same opportunities.
America and even MLK sought “equality”. It is I think what most people aspire to.
And of course you are free to espouse equity over equality (although I will disagree with you). I just don’t ish to ascertain as to whether or not that was your meaning.

 

[InVOLuntary]

View attachment 774576

LOL, he was a drug addicted, wife beater, thief. He held a gun to a pregnant woman's belly. And he caused his own death by overdosing on fentanyl. He was a scumbag that shouldn't have been celebrated. What a clown statement. It's amazing how you far left wing leftist will go to defend someone criminals.

 

[volbeast33]

Wrong

Did you miss the Harvard and NC supreme court rulings?

 

[Orange_Crush]

LOL, he was a drug addicted, wife beater, thief. He held a gun to a pregnant woman's belly. And he caused his own death by overdosing on fentanyl. He was a scumbag that shouldn't have been celebrated. What a clown statement. It's amazing how you far left wing leftist will go to defend someone criminals.

I thought it was a knife.