Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

So the DOJ doubles down and uses it's influence to investigate and intimidate Mom's and dad's asking for input and transparency in their children's schooling? Aren't they just proving Trump correct? Or is it your position that never happened?

I have no problem with them being skeptical of Trump, they should be skeptical of all administrations.

Why were you against the DOJ aiding in the investigation of violent threats against school board members and teachers?

The DOJ referred a total of 6 cases to local authorities, and had zero full investigations of any individual or group, of their own.
 
One more thing that made it all so shocking. I think a lot of people overestimated the evolution of the country.
There was no evolution, you saw Obama as some mythical being sent to set the country right. But he was always just the corrupt product of a corrupt system, Obama is the same as any other president with different window dressing. He's more like Trump than you care to admit, he just has a different style. But remember style is just window dressing.

This is why I had hope during Trump's first presidency, as an outsider I thought he had a chance to fundamentally change the stranglehold the ruling elite have.

I was wrong, and now I know this countries citizens gave up too much control to ever get it back, saved armed rebellion, which even then I don't believe has a chance due to advancement of arms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
Why were you against the DOJ aiding in the investigation of violent threats against school board members and teachers?

The DOJ referred a total of 6 cases to local authorities, and had zero full investigations of any individual or group, of their own.
Internal whistleblowers disagree with your assessment

  • Whistleblower reports: Despite Garland's claims, internal documents and whistleblower reports indicate that the FBI created a "threat tag" for school board-related threats and opened investigations into some parents for simply speaking out at meetings. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee later characterized this as a misuse of counterterrorism resources against parents.
 
Internal whistleblowers disagree with your assessment

  • Whistleblower reports: Despite Garland's claims, internal documents and whistleblower reports indicate that the FBI created a "threat tag" for school board-related threats and opened investigations into some parents for simply speaking out at meetings. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee later characterized this as a misuse of counterterrorism resources against parents.
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
 
“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”, the roots of the BLM movement started with Obama. He was not unifying.

“They cling to guns or religion or antipathy towards people who aren’t like them”

“The Cambridge police acted stupidly”

Regarding “climate change deniers” (a nonexistent group of people), he declared “we don’t have time for flat earthers”.

He greatly and intentionally divided our country. He’s why Trump happened

“Workplace violence”
 
He fooled 200k people or they’re idiots or much worse.

I would do some research. The guy literally said that it was good for a grown man to have a relationship with a young boy.
I have never listened to any of his stuff. Didn’t know who he was till I saw that tweet. Thought the guys tweet was funny that mentioned him though
 
Why were you against the DOJ aiding in the investigation of violent threats against school board members and teachers?

The DOJ referred a total of 6 cases to local authorities, and had zero full investigations of any individual or group, of their own.
The actual number of formal investigations isn’t the point here. It is the chilling effect it created on free speech.
 
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
Yes It's a problem when they are acting on the hyper partisan NSBA and teachers union behalf. Opening investigations on crime that's is one thing, but individuals only expressing concern were referred to and interviewed by DOJ counter terrorism officials with no evidence of any crime committed, just the word of NSBA officials who didn't want themselves held to account by the people they serve.

They treated concerned parents as domestic terrorists..............
 
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
The problem is that since the effort was publicly known; do you think that parents would have some fear speaking out in their local school board meetings.
I feel Garland’s whole goal wasn’t to actually catch culprits; but to deter speech. Which is an abomination to a free people.
The fear was the whole point of the exercise
 
Maybe it’s simply because that lifestyle has been viewed as immoral and wrong for thousands of years.

And ultimately, for those “peoples”. No one is forcing them to make a decision to believe, that is decision made by them and them alone.

Just to be clear, this is not justification for anything.

You think the decision to beliebe being a choice means nothing is forced down our throats. Just to be clear, you don't have to believe anything gay people tell you either.

Nobody can force you to believe but they can force you to go to church. They can/and have imposed norms on all of us. Your community can pressure you. Church was compulsory for me growing up, despiremmte the dangers of molestation. The gay kids didn't do anything to me.
 
Have y'all discussed the released text messages? It reads like a really badly written script from a Britbox crime drama. If I was at all inclined to believe conspiracy theories, I would find it more plausible that 2 old, white small town cops sat down and decided to fabricate a text thread between the suspect and his roommate because they couldn't actually find any evidence.
 
If “evolution” means drag queens in kindergarten story time, men in women’s restrooms and sports teams, criminals being released back onto the street multiple times, and anti Jewish pogroms on college campuses; then I am quite happy to remain unevolved.
Or do you mean something else in terms of the evolution you would like to see?
I am honestly curious as to exactly on what you are basing your evaluation
Some evolutionary changes prove to be beneficial and some changes prove to be damaging. The key is in keeping the positive and eliminating or adjusting the negative.
 
The problem is that since the effort was publicly known; do you think that parents would have some fear speaking out in their local school board meetings.
I feel Garland’s whole goal wasn’t to actually catch culprits; but to deter speech. Which is an abomination to a free people.
The fear was the whole point of the exercise
Speaking at school board meetings =/= threatening school board members and teachers.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top