Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#6,276
#6,276
BeardedVol said:
Why were you against the DOJ aiding in the investigation of violent threats against school board members and teachers?
www.justice.gov

Justice Department Addresses Violent Threats Against School Officials and Teachers

Citing an increase in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools, today Attorney General Merrick B. Garland directed the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to meet in the next 30 days with federal, state...
www.justice.gov www.justice.gov

The DOJ referred a total of 6 cases to local authorities, and had zero full investigations of any individual or group, of their own.
www.usatoday.com

Garland: school board memo aimed at violence, not parent protests; 6 cases referred to local authorities

Attorney General Merrick Garland said the FBI referred six cases of threats against school officials to local officials.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
Internal whistleblowers disagree with your assessment

  • Whistleblower reports: Despite Garland's claims, internal documents and whistleblower reports indicate that the FBI created a "threat tag" for school board-related threats and opened investigations into some parents for simply speaking out at meetings. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee later characterized this as a misuse of counterterrorism resources against parents.
 
#6,278
#6,278
KB5252 said:
Internal whistleblowers disagree with your assessment

  • Whistleblower reports: Despite Garland's claims, internal documents and whistleblower reports indicate that the FBI created a "threat tag" for school board-related threats and opened investigations into some parents for simply speaking out at meetings. Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee later characterized this as a misuse of counterterrorism resources against parents.
Click to expand...
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
 
#6,279
#6,279
Vol8188 said:
“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”, the roots of the BLM movement started with Obama. He was not unifying.

“They cling to guns or religion or antipathy towards people who aren’t like them”

“The Cambridge police acted stupidly”

Regarding “climate change deniers” (a nonexistent group of people), he declared “we don’t have time for flat earthers”.

He greatly and intentionally divided our country. He’s why Trump happened
Click to expand...

“Workplace violence”
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Vol8188 and SpaceCoastVol
#6,280
#6,280
MOOOOONEY said:
He fooled 200k people or they’re idiots or much worse.

I would do some research. The guy literally said that it was good for a grown man to have a relationship with a young boy.
Click to expand...
I have never listened to any of his stuff. Didn’t know who he was till I saw that tweet. Thought the guys tweet was funny that mentioned him though
 
#6,281
#6,281
BeardedVol said:
Why were you against the DOJ aiding in the investigation of violent threats against school board members and teachers?
www.justice.gov

Justice Department Addresses Violent Threats Against School Officials and Teachers

Citing an increase in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools, today Attorney General Merrick B. Garland directed the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to meet in the next 30 days with federal, state...
www.justice.gov www.justice.gov

The DOJ referred a total of 6 cases to local authorities, and had zero full investigations of any individual or group, of their own.
www.usatoday.com

Garland: school board memo aimed at violence, not parent protests; 6 cases referred to local authorities

Attorney General Merrick Garland said the FBI referred six cases of threats against school officials to local officials.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
The actual number of formal investigations isn’t the point here. It is the chilling effect it created on free speech.
 
#6,282
#6,282
BeardedVol said:
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
Click to expand...
Yes It's a problem when they are acting on the hyper partisan NSBA and teachers union behalf. Opening investigations on crime that's is one thing, but individuals only expressing concern were referred to and interviewed by DOJ counter terrorism officials with no evidence of any crime committed, just the word of NSBA officials who didn't want themselves held to account by the people they serve.

They treated concerned parents as domestic terrorists..............
 
#6,283
#6,283
BeardedVol said:
The "threat" tag was used internally for tracking instances to identify possible wider occurrences, to determine if it's something that should or shouldn't be on the FBI's radar. That's really what you have a problem with? The internal tracking mechanism used for instances of threats against educators?

Since when do you guys trust whistleblowers anyway?
Click to expand...
The problem is that since the effort was publicly known; do you think that parents would have some fear speaking out in their local school board meetings.
I feel Garland’s whole goal wasn’t to actually catch culprits; but to deter speech. Which is an abomination to a free people.
The fear was the whole point of the exercise
 
#6,284
#6,284
ETV said:
Maybe it’s simply because that lifestyle has been viewed as immoral and wrong for thousands of years.

And ultimately, for those “peoples”. No one is forcing them to make a decision to believe, that is decision made by them and them alone.
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, this is not justification for anything.

You think the decision to beliebe being a choice means nothing is forced down our throats. Just to be clear, you don't have to believe anything gay people tell you either.

Nobody can force you to believe but they can force you to go to church. They can/and have imposed norms on all of us. Your community can pressure you. Church was compulsory for me growing up, despiremmte the dangers of molestation. The gay kids didn't do anything to me.
 
#6,286
#6,286
luthervol said:
My analogy is that we're in a big row boat rowing in different directions. Sometimes the left gets the edge, sometimes the right gets the edge, and sometimes it's pretty much a stalemate.
But the row boat is in a river with a current flowing left.
Click to expand...
It has been since Obama.
 
#6,287
#6,287
wtmvol said:
Have y'all discussed the released text messages? It reads like a really badly written script from a Britbox crime drama. If I was at all inclined to believe conspiracy theories, I would find it more plausible that 2 old, white small town cops sat down and decided to fabricate a text thread between the suspect and his roommate because they couldn't actually find any evidence.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and LouderVol
#6,288
#6,288
OrangeTsar said:
If “evolution” means drag queens in kindergarten story time, men in women’s restrooms and sports teams, criminals being released back onto the street multiple times, and anti Jewish pogroms on college campuses; then I am quite happy to remain unevolved.
Or do you mean something else in terms of the evolution you would like to see?
I am honestly curious as to exactly on what you are basing your evaluation
Click to expand...
Some evolutionary changes prove to be beneficial and some changes prove to be damaging. The key is in keeping the positive and eliminating or adjusting the negative.
 
#6,290
#6,290
luthervol said:
Some evolutionary changes prove to be beneficial and some changes prove to be damaging. The key is in keeping the positive and eliminating or adjusting the negative.
Click to expand...
Yes, but we have had way too much negative. It's poisoning our kids. That needs to stop.
 
#6,296
#6,296
OrangeTsar said:
The problem is that since the effort was publicly known; do you think that parents would have some fear speaking out in their local school board meetings.
I feel Garland’s whole goal wasn’t to actually catch culprits; but to deter speech. Which is an abomination to a free people.
The fear was the whole point of the exercise
Click to expand...
Speaking at school board meetings =/= threatening school board members and teachers.
 
#6,300
#6,300
luthervol said:
Some evolutionary changes prove to be beneficial and some changes prove to be damaging. The key is in keeping the positive and eliminating or adjusting the negative.
Click to expand...
This isn't so much about evolution as it is the natural progression of civilization toward it's tumble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, marcusluvsvols, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top