Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

Tell me you’re clueless about foundational Christian doctrine without telling me you’re clueless about foundational Christian doctrine.
Can’t speak for Christians but with Messianic Judaism the man is the head of the household.

That sounds great to be the man right?
Wellllllllll,
If I delegate a decision and it goes wrong then whose fault is it? It’s mine. The fault always falls on me …..every damn time.

We are called to love our wife’s like Messiah loves us. Messiah died for us. The wife of a true G-d fearing man is a good place to be. If anyone doesn’t believe me then ask the Ginger what she thinks when I am not around.
 
giphy.gif
Do you know who Fuentes is? Do you know what a groyper is?
 
They will cling to anything to blame except the guns.

Black homicide rate is around 20 per 100k
White rate is around 2 per 100k

Black Americans are less likely to be able to legally own a gun due to increased felony rates. Are significantly more likely to be charged under any specific gun laws.

And yet their homicide rates are still significantly higher.

Some of the states/cities with the strictest gun laws have the highest homicide rates. Meanwhile some of the states with the fewest gun laws (right to carry states for example like New Hampshire) have some of the lowest homicide rates.

The problem isn’t guns nor a lack of gun laws. It’s a pathetic joke to claim otherwise.
 
I have never understood this pov.

Do you have time to explain why you think this way?
In summary, most everyday people share more common interests than differences.

Political and economic elites have long recognized that division is a tool of control. By framing politics as a perpetual left-versus-right struggle, they divert attention from shared economic challenges of the working majority.

While we debate and fight over issues ultra wealthy hype up, elites quietly consolidate wealth and influence, ensuring the system of inequality remains unchallenged.
 
lol your reasoning are two random quotes with zero context? Plenty of civil rights activists have made the claim that the civil rights movement harmed the black community in terms of business ownership and education.

Would you like to provide context to his quotes or do you prefer to simply misrepresent others and live in ignorance
Without the civil rights movement, blacks would still be sitting in the back of the bus, eating in a secluded area, going to different bathrooms, going to different schools and not having a vote. Your lack of ignorance comes from a lack of understanding the nuance within the context. Which Civil Rights activists made those comments? We're you even around in the 1960s? There are still many blacks alive who had to sit in the back of the bus, eat at a different table and drink from a different water fountain.
 
I'm celebrating
BREAKING NEWS!!!
K-town Vol Fan admits celebrating Kirk's death!!!


See how taking a few words from your sentence stating you are in fact not celebrating can change the entire outlook? Quit cherry picking words someone said from an entire conversation to fit a narrative you, not the person who said them, wants.
 
BREAKING NEWS!!!
K-town Vol Fan admits celebrating Kirk's death!!!


See how taking a few words from your sentence stating you are in fact not celebrating can change the entire outlook? Quit cherry picking words someone said from an entire conversation to fit a narrative you, not the person who said them, wants.
giphy.gif
 
In summary, most everyday people share more common interests than differences.

Political and economic elites have long recognized that division is a tool of control. By framing politics as a perpetual left-versus-right struggle, they divert attention from shared economic challenges of the working majority.

While we debate and fight over issues ultra wealthy hype up, elites quietly consolidate wealth and influence, ensuring the system of inequality remains unchallenged.
I see the advantage for political elites to divide. Emotional "purchasing" of votes.

How does it benefit economic elites to foment division?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volanta
Without the civil rights movement, blacks would still be sitting in the back of the bus, eating in a secluded area, going to different bathrooms, going to different schools and not having a vote. Your lack of ignorance comes from a lack of understanding the nuance within the context. Which Civil Rights activists made those comments? We're you even around in the 1960s? There are still many blacks alive who had to sit in the back of the bus, eat at a different table and drink from a different water fountain.

You’re intentionally misunderstanding the argument. He did not say he opposed black people sitting in the front of the bus nor using the same bathroom. Once again it seems you prefer ignorance here. It doesn’t seem like you’ve even attempted to see what he was saying. I provided you two common examples people list as harming the black community post civil rights movement

Malcolm X would be the most obvious example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YankeeVol
Without the civil rights movement, blacks would still be sitting in the back of the bus, eating in a secluded area, going to different bathrooms, going to different schools and not having a vote.
Would you disagree if I said the CRM expedited those things but they would have come to fruition naturally even without the CRM?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top