volfannbama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,406
- Likes
- 20,215
Ok, I didnt say anything about their record, I said they look like trash in 9 of 11 games. Had they looked good in most games only losing by a score or two in most then my opinion of his first year would be different. They didnt.
I don't even know how pruitt being a good dc was relevant to anything yet someone mentioned it.You said Pruitt isn’t a DC anymore, I said well Riley isn’t a OC anymore either. Can you name me OU’s coordinator, and why isn’t he a hot commodity after back to back Heisman’s? We all know who’s baby it is
Let me spell it out for you, we won 5 games. Nothing else matters but wins. Would you care if we looked like crap but still beat Alabama?You have a difficult time with comprehension dont you? Ill type slowly so may be youll get it.
Pruitt didnt have a good first year. His team looked good in 2 of 11 games.
Ok, then, seems we agree that Pruitt didnt have a good year, unless you consider 5-7 at Tennessee a good year.
So then Charlotte was cosching to correct...and Vandy and all the other 26 point losses? Hard to figure how thats and overall good job. We looked very good against Auburn and no I dont care how we won, but let's not forget that we are a wide open dropped pass from being 4-8. For whatever reason, he wasn't able to get his team to perform that was in 9 other games. Therefore not a good job.Who said anyone was happy? We improved. Period. That's all coaching.
Chalking up the season to Charlotte or Vandy is just as silly as chalking it up to AU or UK.Talent surely didn't have a thing to do with the blowout loss to Vandy and the narrow escape against Charlotte.
False.
Pruitt took the worst Tennessee team in history and in year 1:
-Improved the win total, while implementing a new system
-Improved the conference win total by 2 games
-Beat 2 Top 25 teams
-Improved in basically every statistic
-Did all this against a MUCH tougher schedule than the 4-8 team
That’s a good job of coaching, no matter how you spin it.
So you are saying most expected 6-6? Then again, glad we agree he didnt do a good job in year one.After the trumpet man and 4-8? Its not what you re making it out to be, no.
It wasn't Smart replacing Richt at a stocked UGA.
Is 5-7 what's expected out of him going forward? No.
Was it within a game of what most everyone thought they had in year 1? Yes