ecs4dvols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2015
- Messages
- 202
- Likes
- 332
Pitt is the defending ACC champions.The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
The answer is really very simple: the AP is more than one person.The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
The answer is really very simple: the AP is more than one person.
In fact, it is more than one office full of people. It is a LOT of offices full of different people, many of whom don't even know most of the others. In other words, the AP is a large organization.
And just as ESPN can have (a) statisticians running the FPI whose results don't seem to have much in common with (b) the talking heads on TV, who in turn don't seem to agree with (c) the writers who fill up their web sites with articles, so too can the AP have folks in different offices coming to different conclusions.
And on top of ALL that, the AP's weekly Top 25 poll isn't even decided by the staff of the AP. It is farmed out (by invitation only) to about 60 different writers and TV personalities who each get to vote. The vast majority of those 60 don't work for the AP at all. AP are just the ones collecting the votes and tallying them up.
So yeah. If you think of the AP as a person, as a single entity with just one brain, you're gonna have trouble understanding things that you see.
Go Vols!
The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
Rankings and betting lines often don't jive. Nothing unusual.The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
Where has AP issued favorites or predictions?The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?
They do and they don’t. Where a team starts in the poll effects how they end up mid-season. If we keep winning, we’d end up ranked lower than if we started off higher.Exactly why preseason polls mean nothing.
The AP has Pitt ranked higher than Tennessee. The game is at Pitt, a higher ranked team, and the AP, who ranked Pitt higher has Tennessee as the favorite.
If the AP has Tennessee as a favorite on the road, shouldn't the Vols be ranked higher than Pitt according to the same AP?