California Lunacy Thread

You not very smart. Morgan and Morgan are not going to jump at the chance to defend a poor carpenter laborer against a no signal while changing lanes charge

WTF would you need a law firm to defend you for a basic traffic violation especially if you’re guilty. My god you’re dense.
 
SPACE CADET mentioned it not me. And guilty or not has nothing to do with being charged with a traffic offense

And anyone can defend themselves for a traffic violation. In most cases they’ll offer a reduced charge or reduce the fine. If you don’t want to accept that and fight the charge you can. Usually the judge will rule or you can even have a jury trial. The proposal to simply have tiered level of punishment based on income is ridiculous…no wonder you support it.
 
And anyone can defend themselves for a traffic violation. In most cases they’ll offer a reduced charge or reduce the fine. If you don’t want to accept that and fight the charge you can. Usually the judge will rule or you can even have a jury trial. The proposal to simply have tiered level of punishment based on income is ridiculous…no wonder you support it.
I think swampy is drunk... or stoned.
 
And anyone can defend themselves for a traffic violation. In most cases they’ll offer a reduced charge or reduce the fine. If you don’t want to accept that and fight the charge you can. Usually the judge will rule or you can even have a jury trial. The proposal to simply have tiered level of punishment based on income is ridiculous…no wonder you support it.
A $100.00 fine to someone making 6 figures means very little. $100.00 fine for a single mother working at shoneys is crippling
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and NEO

Advertisement



Back
Top