Bryce Brown decision (merged)

Will Bryce Brown return to play (be listed on a gameday roster) for Tennessee?

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
#2,027
#2,027
hatvol96 said:
When I start seeing those guys resurface as contributors somewhere else in a BCS league, I'll consider rethinking the position. Until then, they are stiffs.
Click to expand...

assume you understand that the average for BCS schools is that 35-40% of signing classes end up as stiffs??

If your definition of stiffs is those that don't complete eligibility at school they sign with?? I never know how folks define the different terms they use
 
#2,029
#2,029
LWSVOL said:
If your definition of stiffs is those that don't complete eligibility at school they sign with??
Click to expand...
No, it's guys who can't play dead at the level they were recruited to. The reason Tennessee ended up playing no talent, try hard guys like the Sullins brothers is the fact the recent offensive line classes were littered with gimps, head cases, and guys who just plain sucked.
 
#2,030
#2,030
LWSVOL said:
Player Stars
Morley - Dismissed 5
Myers-Dismissed 2
Vinson-Dismissed 5
Stephens-Transfer 3
R Johnson-Dismissed 4
Sawtelle-Transfer 4
Rogan-Left early NFL 3
Paige-Transfer 4
Maples-Transfer 3
Langley-Transfer 4
Hawkins-Quit Football 3
Donald-Transfer 5
Creer-Transfer 4
Coleman-Transfer 4
Brimfield-Quit Football 3
Berry-Left early for NFL 5
Douglas-Transfer 4
Bailey-Transfer 3
Abrams-Ward-Dismissed 4
Richardson-Dismissed 4
Edwards-Dismissed 3
Brown-Transfer 5
Lamison-Trying to Transfer 2
Campbell-Transfer 3
Click to expand...

Also...go back through all recruitng classes since 2006, assuming RS, and see how many recruits never made it onto campus. Combined, that tells the real story.
 
#2,031
#2,031
Give 'em Six said:
Also...go back through all recruitng classes since 2006, assuming RS, and see how many recruits never made it onto campus. Combined, that tells the real story.
Click to expand...

all that is recorded in these numbers. Not current but updated in Feburary

Following information covers 2002-2009 signing classes for SEC schools. I found a number of players that failed to complete their eligibility at that school. Failures were counted for: players getting dismissed, failing school, transfers, just quit playing football or unknown reasons. If players left school early for NFL, I do not count them as failing to complete eligibility. Last updated in Spring 2010

SEC Teams

Alabama

2009 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 02 (07%)
2008 Rivals # 01 - Signed 32 - 08 (25%)
2007 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2006 Rivals # 11 - Signed 23 - 08 (35%)
2005 Rivals # 18 - Signed 34 - 19 (56%)
2004 Rivals # 15 - Signed 27 - 12 (44%)
2003 Rivals # 49 - Signed 19 - 09 (47%)
2002 Rivals # 30 - Signed 18 - 06 (33%)

Totals Signed 206 – 73 (35%)

Arkansas

2009 Rivals # 31 - Signed 31 - 06 (19%)
2008 Rivals # 36 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2007 Rivals # 31 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 26 - Signed 26 - 11 (38%)
2005 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 11 (46%)
2004 Rivals # 22 - Signed 32 - 17 (53%)
2003 Rivals # 22 - Signed 25 - 12 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 26 - Signed 21 - 06 (29%)

Totals Signed 212 – 79 (37%)

Auburn

2009 Rivals # 19 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)
2007 Rivals # 07 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2006 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 13 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 21 - Signed 29 - 16 (55%)
2003 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2002 Rivals # 06 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)

Totals Signed 219 – 98 (45%)

Florida

2009 Rivals # 11 - Signed 17 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 03 - Signed 22 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 01 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2006 Rivals # 02 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 15 - Signed 18 - 11 (61%)
2004 Rivals # 07 - Signed 23 - 09 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2002 Rivals # 20 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)

Totals Signed 182 – 54 (30%)

Georgia

2009 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 03 (15%)
2008 Rivals # 07 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 09 - Signed 23 - 05 (22%)
2006 Rivals # 04 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2005 Rivals # 10 - Signed 19 - 08 (42%)
2004 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 07 (35%)
2003 Rivals # 06 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 03 - Signed 31 - 13 (42%)

Totals Signed 190 – 55 (29%)

Kentucky

2009 Rivals # 41 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 57 - Signed 20 - 02 (10%)
2007 Rivals # 54 - Signed 29 - 10 (31%)
2006 Rivals # 36 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2005 Rivals # 67 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 45 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 63 - Signed 22 - 12 (55%)
2002 Rivals # 94 - Signed 15 - 08 (53%)

Totals Signed 201 – 76 (37%)

LSU

2009 Rivals # 02 - Signed 24 - 01 (04%)
2008 Rivals # 11 - Signed 26 - 02 (08%)
2007 Rivals # 04 - Signed 26 - 10 (38%)
2006 Rivals # 07 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)
2005 Rivals # 22 - Signed 14 - 05 (36%)
2004 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 06 (23%)
2003 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2002 Rivals # 15 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)

Totals Signed 196 – 61 (31%)

Ole Miss

2009 Rivals # 18 - Signed 37 - 11 (30%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 31 - 04 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 27 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)
2006 Rivals # 16 - Signed 30 - 09 (30%)
2005 Rivals # 30 - Signed 28 - 16 (57%)
2004 Rivals # 30 - Signed 25 - 14 (56%)
2003 Rivals # 38 - Signed 21 - 10 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 33 - Signed 18 - 10 (56%)

Totals Signed 212 – 84 (40%)

Mississippi St

2009 Rivals # 23 - Signed 27 - 03 (11%)
2008 Rivals # 44 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2007 Rivals # 39 - Signed 33 - 11 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 44 - Signed 24 - 10 (42%)
2005 Rivals # 33 - Signed 28 - 15 (54%)
2004 Rivals # 62 - Signed 23 - 17 (74%)
2003 Rivals # 09 - Signed 28 - 13 (46%)
2002 Rivals # 17 - Signed 30 - 19 (63%)

Totals Signed 220 – 96 (44%)

South Carolina

2009 Rivals # 12 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 22 - Signed 23 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 06 - Signed 31 - 08 (26%)
2006 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 08 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 23 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 35 - Signed 29 - 18 (62%)
2003 Rivals # 08 - Signed 28 - 10 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 13 (48%)

Totals Signed 219 – 79 (36%)

Tennessee

2009 Rivals # 10 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2008 Rivals # 35 - Signed 18 - 03 (17%)
2007 Rivals # 03 - Signed 32 - 14 (44%)
2006 Rivals # 23 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 04 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2004 Rivals # 11 - Signed 24 - 07 (29%)
2003 Rivals # 18 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 02 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)

Totals Signed 194 – 63 (32%)

Vanderbilt

2009 Rivals # 73 - Signed 18 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 90 - Signed 21 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 67 - Signed 14 - 01 (07%)
2006 Rivals # 60 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 87 - Signed 25 - 08 (32%)
2004 Rivals # 66 - Signed 20 - 10 (50%)
2003 Rivals # 78 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2002 Rivals # 76 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)

Totals Signed 167 – 51 (31%)

SEC Totals Signed 2418 - 869 (36%)
 
#2,032
#2,032
bigorange said:
Good point regarding coaching the Mannings, I've never thought of it that way.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

not saying he's not a very good QB coach but it makes your job much easier when you work with guys like Peyton and Eli
 
#2,033
#2,033
LWSVOL said:
all that is recorded in these numbers. Not current but updated in Feburary

Following information covers 2002-2009 signing classes for SEC schools. I found a number of players that failed to complete their eligibility at that school. Failures were counted for: players getting dismissed, failing school, transfers, just quit playing football or unknown reasons. If players left school early for NFL, I do not count them as failing to complete eligibility. Last updated in Spring 2010

SEC Teams

Alabama

2009 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 02 (07%)
2008 Rivals # 01 - Signed 32 - 08 (25%)
2007 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2006 Rivals # 11 - Signed 23 - 08 (35%)
2005 Rivals # 18 - Signed 34 - 19 (56%)
2004 Rivals # 15 - Signed 27 - 12 (44%)
2003 Rivals # 49 - Signed 19 - 09 (47%)
2002 Rivals # 30 - Signed 18 - 06 (33%)

Totals Signed 206 – 73 (35%)

Arkansas

2009 Rivals # 31 - Signed 31 - 06 (19%)
2008 Rivals # 36 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2007 Rivals # 31 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 26 - Signed 26 - 11 (38%)
2005 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 11 (46%)
2004 Rivals # 22 - Signed 32 - 17 (53%)
2003 Rivals # 22 - Signed 25 - 12 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 26 - Signed 21 - 06 (29%)

Totals Signed 212 – 79 (37%)

Auburn

2009 Rivals # 19 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)
2007 Rivals # 07 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2006 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 13 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 21 - Signed 29 - 16 (55%)
2003 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2002 Rivals # 06 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)

Totals Signed 219 – 98 (45%)

Florida

2009 Rivals # 11 - Signed 17 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 03 - Signed 22 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 01 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2006 Rivals # 02 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 15 - Signed 18 - 11 (61%)
2004 Rivals # 07 - Signed 23 - 09 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2002 Rivals # 20 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)

Totals Signed 182 – 54 (30%)

Georgia

2009 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 03 (15%)
2008 Rivals # 07 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 09 - Signed 23 - 05 (22%)
2006 Rivals # 04 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2005 Rivals # 10 - Signed 19 - 08 (42%)
2004 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 07 (35%)
2003 Rivals # 06 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 03 - Signed 31 - 13 (42%)

Totals Signed 190 – 55 (29%)

Kentucky

2009 Rivals # 41 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 57 - Signed 20 - 02 (10%)
2007 Rivals # 54 - Signed 29 - 10 (31%)
2006 Rivals # 36 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2005 Rivals # 67 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 45 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 63 - Signed 22 - 12 (55%)
2002 Rivals # 94 - Signed 15 - 08 (53%)

Totals Signed 201 – 76 (37%)

LSU

2009 Rivals # 02 - Signed 24 - 01 (04%)
2008 Rivals # 11 - Signed 26 - 02 (08%)
2007 Rivals # 04 - Signed 26 - 10 (38%)
2006 Rivals # 07 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)
2005 Rivals # 22 - Signed 14 - 05 (36%)
2004 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 06 (23%)
2003 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2002 Rivals # 15 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)

Totals Signed 196 – 61 (31%)

Ole Miss

2009 Rivals # 18 - Signed 37 - 11 (30%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 31 - 04 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 27 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)
2006 Rivals # 16 - Signed 30 - 09 (30%)
2005 Rivals # 30 - Signed 28 - 16 (57%)
2004 Rivals # 30 - Signed 25 - 14 (56%)
2003 Rivals # 38 - Signed 21 - 10 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 33 - Signed 18 - 10 (56%)

Totals Signed 212 – 84 (40%)

Mississippi St

2009 Rivals # 23 - Signed 27 - 03 (11%)
2008 Rivals # 44 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2007 Rivals # 39 - Signed 33 - 11 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 44 - Signed 24 - 10 (42%)
2005 Rivals # 33 - Signed 28 - 15 (54%)
2004 Rivals # 62 - Signed 23 - 17 (74%)
2003 Rivals # 09 - Signed 28 - 13 (46%)
2002 Rivals # 17 - Signed 30 - 19 (63%)

Totals Signed 220 – 96 (44%)

South Carolina

2009 Rivals # 12 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 22 - Signed 23 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 06 - Signed 31 - 08 (26%)
2006 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 08 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 23 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 35 - Signed 29 - 18 (62%)
2003 Rivals # 08 - Signed 28 - 10 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 13 (48%)

Totals Signed 219 – 79 (36%)

Tennessee

2009 Rivals # 10 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2008 Rivals # 35 - Signed 18 - 03 (17%)
2007 Rivals # 03 - Signed 32 - 14 (44%)
2006 Rivals # 23 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 04 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2004 Rivals # 11 - Signed 24 - 07 (29%)
2003 Rivals # 18 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 02 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)

Totals Signed 194 – 63 (32%)

Vanderbilt

2009 Rivals # 73 - Signed 18 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 90 - Signed 21 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 67 - Signed 14 - 01 (07%)
2006 Rivals # 60 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 87 - Signed 25 - 08 (32%)
2004 Rivals # 66 - Signed 20 - 10 (50%)
2003 Rivals # 78 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2002 Rivals # 76 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)

Totals Signed 167 – 51 (31%)

SEC Totals Signed 2418 - 869 (36%)
Click to expand...

Great data...

Just eyeballing it, that makes these loses look statistically insignificant.
 
#2,036
#2,036
utvolpj said:
not saying he's not a very good QB coach but it makes your job much easier when you work with guys like Peyton and Eli
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what your point is.

The fact that these men and their father rate Cut should say everything that needs to be said, doesn't it?
 
#2,038
#2,038
crusse10 said:
Does Peyton Manning become Peyton Manning without David Cutcliffe?

I say yes.
Click to expand...

These arguments are stupid because it is impossible to know, because Peyton Manning became Peyton Manning and had David Cutcliffe as his QB coach.... I mean, of all people you think UT fans would recognize that being a highly ranked HS player does not necesarilly mean they will be a great college and nfl player, but because we have the clarity of hindsight to see that Manning was not a bust and did live up to his billing, we assume that "anybody could have coached him." It's lose-lose for the coaches. If a 5 star player is a bust, it's because the coaches don't know how to "develop talent" but if a 5 star becomes All-Pro then "anybody could have coached him."
 
#2,039
#2,039
Give 'em Six said:
Not when combined with the transfers, dismissals, etc. listed in previous posts above.
Click to expand...

LWSVOL said:
Failures were counted for: players getting dismissed, failing school, transfers, just quit playing football or unknown reasons. If players left school early for NFL, I do not count them as failing to complete eligibility. Last updated in Spring 2010
Click to expand...

Does etc. mean something other than failing school, quitting, or unknown reasons explicitly stated in LWS's post?

You'll need to work a little harder to dismiss that data, imo.
 
#2,040
#2,040
bigorange said:
Good point regarding coaching the Mannings, I've never thought of it that way.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Yeah, forget the fact that the Mannings were coached by their dad (former NFL great) Archie for the first 17 years of their lives. I guess Cutcliffe gets too much credit for coaching them from age 18-21. It's kind of like giving the guys on the runway with the ear muffs and the flash light cones all the credit for bringing a plane from Atlanta airport to LAX.
 
#2,043
#2,043
crusse10 said:
Does Peyton Manning become Peyton Manning without David Cutcliffe?

I say yes.
Click to expand...

You're right, Cut is not solely responsible for Manning's success. But without Cutcliffe, Fulmer would have been running the football 40 times a game, even with the greatest quarterback to ever play the game under center.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#2,045
#2,045
LWSVOL said:
he likely would have went to Florida except for Cutcliffe. Cutcliffe was the reason he chose Tennessee...
Click to expand...

Anyone who disputes that doesn't have a clue. Cutcliffe is practically a member of the Manning family. Archie told the powers that be in Oxford, if you want Eli to come here, you better give Cutcliffe the head coaching job. All Cut did at Oxford was beat Flirida and win two bowl games. When Eli became a Giant, they ran Cut out of town. Brilliant move!:)
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#2,046
#2,046
LWSVOL said:
he likely would have went to Florida except for Cutcliffe. Cutcliffe was the reason he chose Tennessee...
Click to expand...

I thought it came down to Tennessee and Ole Miss, but I guess I was wrong.

If he went to Florida he would have probably had just as much success, if not more.
 
#2,047
#2,047
LWSVOL said:
all that is recorded in these numbers. Not current but updated in Feburary

Following information covers 2002-2009 signing classes for SEC schools. I found a number of players that failed to complete their eligibility at that school. Failures were counted for: players getting dismissed, failing school, transfers, just quit playing football or unknown reasons. If players left school early for NFL, I do not count them as failing to complete eligibility. Last updated in Spring 2010

SEC Teams

Alabama

2009 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 02 (07%)
2008 Rivals # 01 - Signed 32 - 08 (25%)
2007 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2006 Rivals # 11 - Signed 23 - 08 (35%)
2005 Rivals # 18 - Signed 34 - 19 (56%)
2004 Rivals # 15 - Signed 27 - 12 (44%)
2003 Rivals # 49 - Signed 19 - 09 (47%)
2002 Rivals # 30 - Signed 18 - 06 (33%)

Totals Signed 206 – 73 (35%)

Arkansas

2009 Rivals # 31 - Signed 31 - 06 (19%)
2008 Rivals # 36 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2007 Rivals # 31 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 26 - Signed 26 - 11 (38%)
2005 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 11 (46%)
2004 Rivals # 22 - Signed 32 - 17 (53%)
2003 Rivals # 22 - Signed 25 - 12 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 26 - Signed 21 - 06 (29%)

Totals Signed 212 – 79 (37%)

Auburn

2009 Rivals # 19 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)
2007 Rivals # 07 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2006 Rivals # 10 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 13 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 21 - Signed 29 - 16 (55%)
2003 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2002 Rivals # 06 - Signed 29 - 15 (52%)

Totals Signed 219 – 98 (45%)

Florida

2009 Rivals # 11 - Signed 17 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 03 - Signed 22 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 01 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2006 Rivals # 02 - Signed 27 - 09 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 15 - Signed 18 - 11 (61%)
2004 Rivals # 07 - Signed 23 - 09 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 07 (27%)
2002 Rivals # 20 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)

Totals Signed 182 – 54 (30%)

Georgia

2009 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 03 (15%)
2008 Rivals # 07 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 09 - Signed 23 - 05 (22%)
2006 Rivals # 04 - Signed 28 - 07 (25%)
2005 Rivals # 10 - Signed 19 - 08 (42%)
2004 Rivals # 06 - Signed 20 - 07 (35%)
2003 Rivals # 06 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 03 - Signed 31 - 13 (42%)

Totals Signed 190 – 55 (29%)

Kentucky

2009 Rivals # 41 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 57 - Signed 20 - 02 (10%)
2007 Rivals # 54 - Signed 29 - 10 (31%)
2006 Rivals # 36 - Signed 30 - 14 (47%)
2005 Rivals # 67 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 45 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2003 Rivals # 63 - Signed 22 - 12 (55%)
2002 Rivals # 94 - Signed 15 - 08 (53%)

Totals Signed 201 – 76 (37%)

LSU

2009 Rivals # 02 - Signed 24 - 01 (04%)
2008 Rivals # 11 - Signed 26 - 02 (08%)
2007 Rivals # 04 - Signed 26 - 10 (38%)
2006 Rivals # 07 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)
2005 Rivals # 22 - Signed 14 - 05 (36%)
2004 Rivals # 02 - Signed 26 - 06 (23%)
2003 Rivals # 01 - Signed 28 - 11 (39%)
2002 Rivals # 15 - Signed 26 - 13 (50%)

Totals Signed 196 – 61 (31%)

Ole Miss

2009 Rivals # 18 - Signed 37 - 11 (30%)
2008 Rivals # 29 - Signed 31 - 04 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 27 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)
2006 Rivals # 16 - Signed 30 - 09 (30%)
2005 Rivals # 30 - Signed 28 - 16 (57%)
2004 Rivals # 30 - Signed 25 - 14 (56%)
2003 Rivals # 38 - Signed 21 - 10 (48%)
2002 Rivals # 33 - Signed 18 - 10 (56%)

Totals Signed 212 – 84 (40%)

Mississippi St

2009 Rivals # 23 - Signed 27 - 03 (11%)
2008 Rivals # 44 - Signed 27 - 08 (30%)
2007 Rivals # 39 - Signed 33 - 11 (33%)
2006 Rivals # 44 - Signed 24 - 10 (42%)
2005 Rivals # 33 - Signed 28 - 15 (54%)
2004 Rivals # 62 - Signed 23 - 17 (74%)
2003 Rivals # 09 - Signed 28 - 13 (46%)
2002 Rivals # 17 - Signed 30 - 19 (63%)

Totals Signed 220 – 96 (44%)

South Carolina

2009 Rivals # 12 - Signed 29 - 05 (17%)
2008 Rivals # 22 - Signed 23 - 03 (13%)
2007 Rivals # 06 - Signed 31 - 08 (26%)
2006 Rivals # 24 - Signed 24 - 08 (33%)
2005 Rivals # 23 - Signed 28 - 14 (50%)
2004 Rivals # 35 - Signed 29 - 18 (62%)
2003 Rivals # 08 - Signed 28 - 10 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 11 - Signed 27 - 13 (48%)

Totals Signed 219 – 79 (36%)

Tennessee

2009 Rivals # 10 - Signed 24 - 03 (13%)
2008 Rivals # 35 - Signed 18 - 03 (17%)
2007 Rivals # 03 - Signed 32 - 14 (44%)
2006 Rivals # 23 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 04 - Signed 27 - 11 (41%)
2004 Rivals # 11 - Signed 24 - 07 (29%)
2003 Rivals # 18 - Signed 22 - 08 (36%)
2002 Rivals # 02 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)

Totals Signed 194 – 63 (32%)

Vanderbilt

2009 Rivals # 73 - Signed 18 - 01 (06%)
2008 Rivals # 90 - Signed 21 - 01 (05%)
2007 Rivals # 67 - Signed 14 - 01 (07%)
2006 Rivals # 60 - Signed 25 - 09 (36%)
2005 Rivals # 87 - Signed 25 - 08 (32%)
2004 Rivals # 66 - Signed 20 - 10 (50%)
2003 Rivals # 78 - Signed 22 - 11 (50%)
2002 Rivals # 76 - Signed 22 - 10 (45%)

Totals Signed 167 – 51 (31%)

SEC Totals Signed 2418 - 869 (36%)
Click to expand...

These stats make you appreciate Saban's recruiting ability, and doubt Richt's development ability.
 
#2,050
#2,050
LWSVOL said:
Player Stars
Morley - Dismissed 5
Myers-Dismissed 2
Vinson-Dismissed 5
Stephens-Transfer 3
R Johnson-Dismissed 4
Sawtelle-Transfer 4
Rogan-Left early NFL 3
Paige-Transfer 4
Maples-Transfer 3
Langley-Transfer 4
Hawkins-Quit Football 3
Donald-Transfer 5
Creer-Transfer 4
Coleman-Transfer 4
Brimfield-Quit Football 3
Berry-Left early for NFL 5
Douglas-Transfer 4
Bailey-Transfer 3
Abrams-Ward-Dismissed 4
Richardson-Dismissed 4
Edwards-Dismissed 3
Brown-Transfer 5
Lamison-Trying to Transfer 2
Campbell-Transfer 3
Click to expand...

Good Lord that is appalling. However, I only see 4 interior linemen, so our biggest deficiencies (OL/DT) would still be upon us. Thats one of the strangest/saddest things about the end of the fulmer era that will continue to haunt us through 2010, his inability to sign the big uglies.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top