Brady Hoke -- Master Recruiter

#1

WiseOlVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
4,038
Likes
3,556
#1
Michigan had 11 guys drafted and put 8 free agents on teams. These were all Hoke recruits. Makes him the best Recruiter in Michigan's history.

Welcome to The Hill, Coach Hoke.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 21 people
#3
#3
Recruiting can be different when you are the Head Coach vs Position...

Hoke_zps73ef782b.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#4
#4
Michigan had 11 guys drafted and put 8 free agents on teams. These were all Hoke recruits. Makes him the best Recruiter in Michigan's history.

Welcome to The Hill, Coach Hoke.

They were also developed under Harbaugh but you'll be damned if you give him any credit for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5
#5
Recruiting can be different when you are the Head Coach vs Position...

Hoke_zps73ef782b.jpg

Michigan has 1 (shared) NC since 1948, Is 1-11 v Ohio state (hoke beat them), and was coming off 3-9 when hoke got there. Give the man some credit for knowing where to look, making the sale and, after the 2017 draft, having a lot of goodwill with the high school coaches who are very proud today.

He's ours now. Not Michigan's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19 people
#6
#6
Recruiting can be different when you are the Head Coach vs Position...

Hoke is going to be a major asset for us on the recruiting trail. Very excited to have him as a position coach even if it is only for a few seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#7
#7
Hoke will make a huge difference on D this year I am very excited that he is apart of our coaching staff
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#9
#9
Recruiting for Michigan is a bit easier in the Mid West than recruiting for Tennessee in the South. Only serious competitors with Michigan is Ohio State and possibly Michigan State and Notre Dame.

We have 5-7 major schools who we directly compete with (FL, GA, Bama, LSU, Auburn, USCe, Clemson, FSU). Big difference. Plus our home state is not the same as the state of Michigan. He will find it tough here in the South.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
Recruiting for Michigan is a bit easier in the Mid West than recruiting for Tennessee in the South. Only serious competitors with Michigan is Ohio State and possibly Michigan State and Notre Dame.

We have 5-7 major schools who we directly compete with (FL, GA, Bama, LSU, Auburn, USCe, Clemson, FSU). Big difference. Plus our home state is not the same as the state of Michigan. He will find it tough here in the South.

You can add these schools to your list:

FIU- Butch Davis
FAU- Lane
USF- Strong
UCF- Frost

As these smaller schools get more established it's only going to make recruiting the state of FL that much more difficult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#11
#11
They were also developed under Harbaugh but you'll be damned if you give him any credit for it.

You have to have them to development them, but you’ll be damned to give any credit for it. I have full confidence of the ability of our current coaching staff to develop players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#12
#12
You can add these schools to your list:

FIU- Butch Davis
FAU- Lane
USF- Strong
UCF- Frost

As these smaller schools get more established it's only going to make recruiting the state of FL that much more difficult.

The only draw they have is playing time and a way to the NFL. If a recruit wants to compete for a NC they won't go to any non power 5 school.
 
#14
#14
If we can manage to exceed expectations this year, have a feeling we are going to be on upswing for a few years w qb's in house and guys like Brady and new hires doing the right things. Get ready boys! Go Vols!
 
#15
#15
Michigan had 11 guys drafted and put 8 free agents on teams. These were all Hoke recruits. Makes him the best Recruiter in Michigan's history.

Welcome to The Hill, Coach Hoke.

Here is a Master Debate question:

Should we be thrilled with all of the talent that Hoke got to Michigan or a bit worried that it took another coach to develop that talent into a squad that wasn't historically bad by Michigan standards?

My opinion - Good position coach, was WAY out of his element as head coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#16
#16
You can add these schools to your list:

FIU- Butch Davis
FAU- Lane
USF- Strong
UCF- Frost

As these smaller schools get more established it's only going to make recruiting the state of FL that much more difficult.

The best players still want to play in the best conference, so I'd say the SEC still has a huge advantage in recruiting the best players
 
#17
#17
Here is a Master Debate question:

Should we be thrilled with all of the talent that Hoke got to Michigan or a bit worried that it took another coach to develop that talent into a squad that wasn't historically bad by Michigan standards?

My opinion - Good position coach, was WAY out of his element as head coach.

A coach has to get them there 1st.

Hoke will be able to focus on one position group rather than being the "caretaker" of a program, he may be back in the "briar patch".
 
#18
#18
my memory is a bit of a blur on this but I think he was a very successful head coach before he returned to Michigan. San Diego or the like?

EDIT:
yes, he was head man at San Diego State 2009 and 2010 before going to Michigan 2011. He did a great job those two years in reviving that program and that led to his return to Michigan. He was Ball State head coach before that.

He is a good one! I believe the only reason he joined the Vols was a long standing relationship.with Butch. He could have had many options and he chose Tenn.

We won't have him long, but I think we are lucky to have him!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#19
#19
The best players still want to play in the best conference, so I'd say the SEC still has a huge advantage in recruiting the best players

I'm not talking about the 5* players. I'm talking about the John Kelly 3/4* type player. The ones that make up a majority of the roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
The only draw they have is playing time and a way to the NFL. If a recruit wants to compete for a NC they won't go to any non power 5 school.

Based on what I see in college football today. few have a interest in getting a NC. Most are all about doing their time in school and getting on to the NFL. Sad but true.

Look at the us here. Few complete their 4 year eligibility except for those that have no NFL chance. Most 4 and 5 star recruits do 3 years and out.
 
#21
#21
Based on what I see in college football today. few have a interest in getting a NC. Most are all about doing their time in school and getting on to the NFL. Sad but true.

Look at the us here. Few complete their 4 year eligibility except for those that have no NFL chance. Most 4 and 5 star recruits do 3 years and out.

CBJ may be on to something when looking for players that have won Championships in HS. That experience may help drive them at the collegiate level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#24
#24
You have to have them to development them, but you’ll be damned to give any credit for it. I have full confidence of the ability of our current coaching staff to develop players.

Full confidence? Too early to say that, IMO. High Hopes? There I shall go.
 
#25
#25
Here is a Master Debate question:

Should we be thrilled with all of the talent that Hoke got to Michigan or a bit worried that it took another coach to develop that talent into a squad that wasn't historically bad by Michigan standards?

My opinion - Good position coach, was WAY out of his element as head coach.

You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

Re develoment, Harbaugh got Hoke's 2017-draft kids when they were Sophs or Jr.s. Can't give Harbaugh all the credit. Some, yes. But how much?

He's a bit of a clown. Makes $9million/year and hasn't done better than 3rd in the division. Riding a 1-3 streak. Playing 8-9 cupcakes annually. Poster boy for "All Hat, No Cattle."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement



Back
Top