I used 'military assault rifle' specifically because I knew an 18 year old could not go in and buy that gun. It was intended to show that there are reasonable and rational laws that are already enforced that do not destroy the second amendment and deny you the right to own your guns. Some of you guys are so easily trapped it almost takes the fun out of the hunt.
No, I think you're talking out of your bung hole again and you realized how silly you looked so now you're throwing shade. You know little about laws, the constitution and firearms. You have no clue as to what makes one weapon different than the other. You're just like that TV station that misidentified a shotgun for an AR. Your knowledge of firearms comes from CNN.
If republicans really wanted to make a dent in unnecessary deaths they would/could do the same.
Everyone acknowledges the trade offs between liberty, safety, security, and freedom. It is a line that will be debated until the end of time.
