#BoycottNRA

Are you guys actually this blind or just practicing selective blindness?

The ability to keep guns out of the hands of criminals is partially reliant on identifying the sources. Why does that scare you guys so much?

If, stolen guns were reported within 48 hours and all legal transfer of gun ownership was reported, guns would be easily traceable. Also many sources of guns for criminals would suspiciously and immediately disappear.
Again luther.. this only applies to law abiding people. It does NOTHING to trace the guns held by criminals. And as you have already stated, your objective is to then use this information as a hammer against law abiding people.
 
No we get it Loother. You want to take all of the guns and stop making them available to civilians. That way no one has them so no one can steal what you don't have.

Just say it and stop with BS round and round.

Like I said, you don't get it. I hope you have a at least a little clue of how wrong you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
It's easier to blame the big, bad, NRA, than to blame government institutions that liberals think are infallible.

Not a member. Never considered being one. Own several guns. And that doesn't change or sway my stance one bit. I don't need the government or an organization to tell me how I should think.

But that's just me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
That's it. See no big deal. If the same person reports stolen guns again two months later, add a red flag to his name. If the same person reports stolen guns a third time....something is up.
As long as he reports it to the FBI he would have nothing to worry about.
 
In hopes of getting them back? In hopes of catching the thief?

Are you serious? Reporting them stolen doesn't help catch the thief. The police don't try and solve burglary cases. The only thing reporting a gun stolen does is it helps if they end up coming across it during some other bust. Criminals don't hold on to stolen items. They fence them as soon as possible, usually within hours. It solves none of the issues that you claim would have prevented the Florida shooting. In fact I now of no mass shootings it would have prevented. None of your proposed laws would have prevented any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Not a member. Never considered being one. Own several guns. And that doesn't change or sway my stance one bit. I don't need the government or an organization to tell me how I should think.

But that's just me.

The only reason I'm a member is they are the last line of defense against the Luthers of the world. And, I enjoy the magazine each month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
In hopes of getting them back? In hopes of catching the thief?

Your chances of getting back cash may be the only thing lower.

At least or until it's used in a crime, which I guess is what we're really or supposed to be worried about here given the discussion. In which point you are way too late.
 
The only reason I'm a member is they are the last line of defense against the Luthers of the world. And, I enjoy the magazine each month.

I have no issues with that or them. Have several family members and friends that are members.

Last line of defense is a little strong but understand the thought.
 
According to Loo I get 2 more chances before any "red flags" pop up on the authorities radar.
Yeah but he wants to make a law that you are partially responsible for any crime that was committed with your stolen weapon.

Crucifixion for you. Out the door line on the left, one cross each.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Does Freak get paid by the click on this site? I am starting to think luther might be a clickbait troll because nobody can genuinely as stupid as some of the stuff he continually posts, but he gets responses.

Freak... love you. Mean it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Advertisement





Back
Top