There are a lot of parts to the Haslam story that I don't get. Doug Mathews on Big Orange Sunday went on a rant about the UT administration and how anyone with real UT roots is considered inbred and it is a negative on their resume.
You can hear it here:
https://audioboom.com/posts/6516001-big-orange-sunday-11-26-17.mp3 Note: this show was ending just as the Schiano debacle was just getting momentum. Doug hadn't heard of the hire yet, and was giving Currie credit for "doing a fine job". Shows you how Currie had everyone fooled that he was actually shopping for a coach.
Weird to me since Papa Haslam was a captain on Neyland's 1951 national championship team.
I think the inbred ban is real, and I also think we haven't had a chancellor lately (Cheek and now Davenport) that really gave a rip about the tradition and glory days of UT football. All they want to do is tear down buildings and put up new ones. Think Davenport has watched YOUTUBE of the '86 Sugarbowl? (Like I did last night).
Thing is, those administrators don't really care. Maybe they see a Fulmer or Blackburn as inbred and something they can't control. I dunno - but I think (and you'll hear Doug Mathews talk about this) as long as the AD is under the Chancellor, who is under the President - that the chain of command is screwy and accountability is passed down the tree.
I wonder if Big Jim Haslam ever tries to ovverrule little Jimmy? Is little Jimmy Haslam the George Costanza of athletics?
I have to admit, I thought Currie might have been a little more "professional" than Fulmer as AD. After Sunday, please put Fulmer in there as AD. I think he could handle the Haslam problem, however that's exactly why he won't be AD.