Blake Toppmeyer On Finebaum Now

#8
#8
Pretty much repeated everything we have heard already on this case. He said decision should go above Pruitt and Fulmer’s head and go straight to the top of the university. Then Finebaum praises him for his journalism. That’s about it.
 
#9
#9
Curious as to why Toppmeyer didn’t say why Thompson got a restraining order on the women in SC?
It was a mutual restraining order.
 
#10
#10
Pretty much repeated everything we have heard already on this case. He said decision should go above Pruitt and Fulmer’s head and go straight to the top of the university. Then Finebaum praises him for his journalism. That’s about it.

So journalism is pulling what others have reported and not drawing your own conclusions? That gets chalked up for good journalism?

Hell 92% of VN falls into that category then.
 
#16
#16
Exactly.

Before anyone says different every news outlet out there pushes their own purpose. They’re going to make this as bad as it can get to try and influence a ruling. Whether or not he actually meant what he said or didn’t say.
 
#18
#18
Ticked me off watching that. Mutual restraining order. Meaning both parties are at fault and both are supposed to stay away from one another. From what I've read this is common in divorce cases.

Not to mention anyone can say what they want in a restraining order and he obviously didn't read the other side of it.
 
#19
#19
I just don't think that will happen, he got mad and overreacted and now everybody else is overreacting. Not meaning you. jmo

Over reacting yes but unfortunately the world we now live in will handle this the only way they know how is to cut and run.

I’m in the group that says move on. Tennessee isn’t in the Louisville Auburn group where anyone can play at any time. A standard is trying to be set across the board and I don’t see Pruitt keeping nonsense like this around.

Again, just my opinion.
 
#20
#20
Ticked me off watching that. Mutual restraining order. Meaning both parties are at fault and both are supposed to stay away from one another. From what I've read this is common in divorce cases.

Not to mention anyone can say what they want in a restraining order and he obviously didn't read the other side of it.


So was this the woman in said restraining order?
 
#24
#24
No. They are two different women. Obviously he has a temper and I'm not excusing his behavior but it was frustrating that he was obviously pushing an agenda and Paul was acting like he broke Watergate.

Which only confirms what was said earlier. It fits whatever Paul wanted it to fit. Smh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amorange
Advertisement



Back
Top