Baggett gone

#401
#401
LawVol13 said:
Come on, pl3. Everyone that has any connection pretty much says that Dooley asked him to leave.
Click to expand...


I don't believe as much that I read on here as you. That being said, if DD did ask him to leave, it had nothing to do with DD favoring a soph WR or taking his side over the position coach he hired last year. DD isn't that dumb and that story is a joke.
Other things are there. We just don't know, so we blame it all on Rogers or Dooley.
 
#402
#402
haha the only bright spot was our receivers..mainly hunter and rogers. makes perfect sense to get rid of their coach and keep our other offensive coaches..go dooley!
 
#403
#403
AllVolYall said:
I think you miss the point. A good coach with a good resume just does not have to put up with a bunch of BS.
Click to expand...


You're crazy man. They all put up with a bunch of BS. You have 90 guys in the locker room and 60 of them haven't turned 21 yet.

Go ask any coach what one of the most difficult things is with coaching and they will tell you it's the kids, and the kids parents.
 
#404
#404
pl3 said:
I don't believe as much that I read on here as you.
Click to expand...

LWS is connected and says that and he broke the damn story on Baggett. Hubbs said it was a mutual decision and he works for the University. I'm not sure what more you need.
 
#405
#405
pl3 said:
I don't believe as much that I read on here as you. That being said, if DD did ask him to leave, it had nothing to do with DD favoring a soph WR or taking his side over the position coach he hired last year. DD isn't that dumb and that story is a joke.
Other things are there. We just don't know, so we blame it all on Rogers or Dooley.
Click to expand...

I don't blame Rogers at all. I do think it's a horrible move by Dooley.
 
#406
#406
LawVol13 said:
Chuck Smith had never been a d-line coach in his life and isn't one now. Baggett was an incredibly established WR coach. Thompson was already a more established D-line coach than Smith, and he was sitting there on the staff. This isn't even a remotely comparable situation, skeeter. You know that and I know that.
Click to expand...

chuck smith is very good at teaching the dline. maybe i should have used the word teach instead of coach.

i dont think anyone on this planet is questioning ccb coaching skills.ive hinted toward some things all day and ill try again without getting in some hot water. a position coach should never be able to override an offensive cord, but when a position coach has the title of assistant head coach worlds start colliding.

im done on the subject. the real truth will surface in due time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#407
#407
skeeter33418 said:
chuck smith is a very good dline coach but our team is better without him. hope that makes sense. i know its hard to do, but people just need to let this thing play out.
Click to expand...

From most accounts he wasn't very good at coaching a DL.
Dooley gave him a shot and it blew up. Sounds like he was better at the individual technique stuff. More to a DL coach than that.
 
#410
#410
skeeter33418 said:
chuck smith is very good at teaching the dline. maybe i should have used the word teach instead of coach.

i dont think anyone on this planet is questioning ccb coaching skills.ive hinted toward some things all day and ill try again without getting in some hot water. a position coach should never be able to override an offensive cord, but when a position coach has the title of assistant head coach worlds start colliding.

im done on the subject. the real truth will surface in due time.
Click to expand...

Sure they start colliding. If it came down to Baggett or Chaney, I'm going with Baggett 10 times out of 10. That's my point. We ran off the coach with the best resume of anyone on the staff in favor of an offensive coordinator who is currently failing. That's why it's bad news for Tennessee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#413
#413
Orange Blazer said:
Yea thats exactly what it sounds like. Stupid.
Click to expand...

You're right, that is exactly what it sounds like. You pick one quote from Hubbs to say Baggett's "just sailing off into the sunset" and ignore another post by Hubbs saying it was a "mutual decision" to part ways. In other words, you're putting your head in the sand and ignoring Hubbs other post and putting your head in the sand ignoring Skeeter's posts, LWS posts and virtually every single person in the know that has commented on this.

So, yes, you absolutely are avoiding the truth and putting your head in the sand.
 
#414
#414
LawVol13 said:
Sure they start colliding. If it came down to Baggett or Chaney, I'm going with Baggett 10 times out of 10. That's my point. We ran off the coach with the best resume of anyone on the staff in favor of an offensive coordinator who is currently failing. That's why it's bad news for Tennessee.
Click to expand...

You nor anyone else here knows exactly what went down. Its silly to say you would take him over Chaney ten times withoit having facts first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#416
#416
LawVol13 said:
No, that's exactly what it sounds like. You pick one quote from Hubbs to say Baggett's "just sailing off into the sunset" and ignore another post by Hubbs saying it was a "mutual decision" to part ways. In other words, you're putting your head in the sand and ignoring Hubbs other post and putting your head in the sand ignoring Skeeter's posts, LWS posts and virtually every single person in the know that has commented on this.

So, yes, you absolutely are avoiding the truth and putting your head in the sand.
Click to expand...

Here is a novel idea fella. I didnt see the other post by Hubbs? Has that thought ever crossed your immature mind?
 
#417
#417
Orange Blazer said:
You nor anyone else here knows exactly what went down. Its silly to say you would take him over Chaney ten times withoit having facts first.
Click to expand...

Sure, keep the guy that's failing; always a good decision for the staff. I fail to see a scenario where I would keep Chaney and ask Baggett to leave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#418
#418
Orange Blazer said:
Here is a novel idea fella. I didnt see the other post by Hubbs? Has that thought ever crossed your immature mind?
Click to expand...

Here's a novel idea, instead of calling someone stupid who points out your obvious ignorance of the situation, admit you're wrong and quit looking like a jackass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#419
#419
LawVol13 said:
Chuck Smith had never been a d-line coach in his life and isn't one now. Baggett was an incredibly established WR coach. Thompson was already a more established D-line coach than Smith, and he was sitting there on the staff. This isn't even a remotely comparable situation, skeeter. You know that and I know that.
Click to expand...

I think what he was inferring was...read between the lines.
 
#420
#420
LWSVOL said:
dooley cannot be the head coach and coach WRs. that will not work at all.. HC has too many other things to do away frmo complex so WRs would running free with no over sight.. Dooley ain't coaching any position group
Click to expand...

so not true
 
#422
#422
This is very interesting. First chuck smith has problems with the DC now Baggett has problems with the OC at the end of the season. The whole assistant coach being something other than the OC or DC happens at a lot of places but here it seemed to be a problem because Chaney was sucking it up with play calling? Just trying to read between the lines here.
 
#423
#423
Orange Blazer said:
"He tells me he's retiring. Multiple people have told me it's not about da'rick. Baggett was complimentary to me about Rogers the last few weeks. I don't think da'rick has forced him into retirement."

-Brent Hubbs Volquest

Let's just move on to something else guys.
Click to expand...

I've known Brent for 14 years. he is not going to deviate from what someone says. CB told him that I'm sure. I believe Brent. Doesn't mean CB told him everything..

Brent may know other things about everything but he will not say things different then what those have told him, even if he knows some of those different things from others.

jmo
 
#424
#424
LWSVOL said:
I've known Brent for 14 years. he is not going to deviate from what someone says. CB told him that I'm sure. I believe Brent. Doesn't mean CB told him everything..

Brent may know other things about everything but he will not say things different then what those have told him, even if he knows some of those different things from others.

jmo
Click to expand...

I think that's exactly right.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top