honestly if we are going to play the price game then what's the point?
the cars are not in the same universe.
the Cayman is right in line with Z06; should we compare the Focus and Vette?
You did phrase it as though the cayman was a viable alternative to the focus.
That said. It's a shame that I already put a deposit on the new Miata. Should have waited for that cayman!
You guys can have the Focus - I'll take the Cayman GT4
Porsche Cayman GT4 does the 'Ring in 7:40
Jalopnik approved
Porsche Cayman GT4: This Is It
I would agree but I'm not allowed to compare cars in this thread![]()
cool lets compare the mustang to a ferrari next time
The V-8 engine skips turbo- or supercharging in favor of a sky-high redlinetheres no official number yet, but weve heard 8000-plus rpmand that fancy flat-plane crank, a trick favored by Ferrari.
For those unfamiliar, a flat crankshaft design involves attaching the crank pins at 180-degree intervals rather than the usual 90; this allows for a firing order that bounces back and forth between the two cylinder banks, providing evenly spaced exhaust pulses.
These are not our typical comparison tests. Here we are looking mostly for relative value, which is a slippery thing. Determining winners in these pairings meant trying to reconcile price with goodnessi.e., if a car is three times as expensive as its rival, it must be three times as fun, rewarding, and well-executed to beat it. Two numbers in boxes at the end of each story keep score: The one on the left expresses the price ratio between the two cars; the one on the right reveals what we're calling the "experience" factor, based on a modified version of our Final Results scores. If the price box holds the larger number, cheap wins; if the experience number is larger, expensive does. Simple, right?
