Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 71,157
- Likes
- 39,059
But if Google makes the program they'll know what China knows. Not that I'm okay with this sort of intrusion, but if it's not Google, it'll just be a Chinese company doing the same thing (if they aren't already). This way, at least, we have a pretty good idea of what sort spying and information collecting is going on and if there's back door so much the better for us, too.That’s asinine. The Chinese will have total control over the google product. This is nothing more than google profiting off of oppression. Which is fine, they are a private company, my only beef with google is their hypocrisy.
But if Google makes the program they'll know what China knows. Not that I'm okay with this sort of intrusion, but if it's not Google, it'll just be a Chinese company doing the same thing (if they aren't already). This way, at least, we have a pretty good idea of what sort spying and information collecting is going on and if there's back door so much the better for us, too.
Not you and me, that's for sure.You're putting a lot of faith in google. My guess is that we will NOT have access to the system they build for China.
Give me something to go on besides terrified. I was trying to relate to your background.
There is no better form of government control than a weapon. You think weapons we sell other countries are not used to control it's people?
It's frightening that they would abandon the principles they say have guided the company and build out a system that allows the government to specifically identify anyone seeking information the government deems dangerous. It is the most effective spying on the populace tool ever particularly linking it through mobile devices.
Actually governments rarely use the weapons we sell them against their people - they may be used against combatants from other countries but outside some specific examples in Syria, Iran and Iraq I'm not seeing what you suggest. Also some of these weapons end up in the hands of people to defend themselves against governments.
Alternatively Google is proposing the building and control of a system to target individuals before they ever need to use weapons against them.
If you don't see the issue with Dragonfly then nothing I can say here will change that. It's 1984 on steroids. The fact Google is planning to be a willing participant tells me a lot about the moral compass of a company who had a slogan "do no evil".
All that said I've never suggested our government should stop them from doing it. Their soul should but clearly that's long ago been sold.
Google never defined "evil".
Yeah, whatever happened to "Don't be evil"?Weapons companies make products that are designed for destruction. Before they can sell them to foreign powers the US must approve. Everyone knows the purpose.
What Google is doing here is taking a product they've built on the basis of providing more access and freedom to people and intentionally weaponizing it for a foreign government to control it's people. It is entirely antithetic to the ethos on which Google was founded. This is why so many of the employees oppose the move.
It is actually very different. Google is actively colluding with the Chinese government to place these "features" into their products. Weapon sales don't involve that level of communication and coordination.From an american company perspective, it's not much different than selling weapons to Saudi Arabia.
I don't like it but there is nothing we can do without government intervention. It''s capitalism, that is just the way it is. Do you have a solution or an idea that might alleviate your concerns?It's frightening that they would abandon the principles they say have guided the company and build out a system that allows the government to specifically identify anyone seeking information the government deems dangerous. It is the most effective spying on the populace tool ever particularly linking it through mobile devices.
Actually governments rarely use the weapons we sell them against their people - they may be used against combatants from other countries but outside some specific examples in Syria, Iran and Iraq I'm not seeing what you suggest. Also some of these weapons end up in the hands of people to defend themselves against governments.
Alternatively Google is proposing the building and control of a system to target individuals before they ever need to use weapons against them.
If you don't see the issue with Dragonfly then nothing I can say here will change that. It's 1984 on steroids. The fact Google is planning to be a willing participant tells me a lot about the moral compass of a company who had a slogan "do no evil".
All that said I've never suggested our government should stop them from doing it. Their soul should but clearly that's long ago been sold.
Google’s dominance in online search is somewhat troubling in and of itself. They have to be worried about possible antitrust action from Washington but have evidently donated to enough lawmakers to avoid any such action up to now.I don't like it but there is nothing we can do without government intervention. It''s capitalism, that is just the way it is. Do you have a solution or an idea that might alleviate your concerns?
I don't like it but there is nothing we can do without government intervention. It''s capitalism, that is just the way it is. Do you have a solution or an idea that might alleviate your concerns?