I’m eternally optimistic. I don’t get why some folks on here will slam you for having unrealistic expectations. Who gives a sh*t? It’s a football fan message board. And anything can happen. Was it a realistic expectation to think that an 85-1 horse could win the derby? Nope. But it happened. Same goes for football.Where is your spirit Clarence???
Just for giggles, I pretended to be able to read the minds of the statisticians at ESPN, and came up with my own way-too-early version of the FPI.Just trying to make a point, but yes it is possible but not probable.
Just for giggles, I pretended to be able to read the minds of the statisticians at ESPN, and came up with my own way-too-early version of the FPI.
FPI isn't yet giving game-by-game chances to win. So here's what I made up on their behalf. You can argue each of these if you wish, but that's not the point of this post. Just trying to get an order of magnitude estimate for us winning (or losing) all twelve games.
If the Vols' chances to win are:
- Ball State - 99%
- Pittsburgh - 48%
- Akron - 99%
- Florida - 45%
- LSU - 40%
- Bama - 20%
- UT Martin - 99%
- Kentucky - 65%
- UGa - 25%
- Mizzou - 75%
- USCe - 70%
- Vandy - 98%
Then our likelihood to win all twelve is .0014. That's 0.14%. About one-tenth of one percent.
Our likelihood to lose all twelve is so much lower: .00000000005, or 0.000000005%.
In other words, neither extreme is probable. Or likely. Or even possible. Not in any realistic sense.
You've made your point, man, but I don't agree with it. We can absolutely narrow our future down a lot better than "0 to 12."
Go Vols!
I’m eternally optimistic. I don’t get why some folks on here will slam you for having unrealistic expectations. Who gives a sh*t? It’s a football fan message board. And anything can happen. Was it a realistic expectation to think that an 85-1 horse could win the derby? Nope. But it happened. Same goes for football.
Fair points. Noone that has done much of anything yet. I certainly did not mean to insult our players. My bad.Your claim: "We brought back virtuaiiy no one to a secondary that struggled ... "
Sure, there's room for improvement from the NUMEROUS secondary guys that played that we brought back, as aside from the picked-on Burrell, there's Hadden, Turnage, Flowers, McCullogh, Slaughter, and McDonald. There's Charles and Rucker, who were true freshmen, but no longer. Then there are the incoming guys that are new to us but are veterans: D.Williams, Walker, and Turrentine. We have no idea what all this secondary might do.
yeah were horrible on 3rd down defense and that has to be fixed. I do think a more consistent offense would make the defense tremendously better. The defense showed they can get stops early. The problem comes when we go 3 & out in under a minute for 4-5 straight drives in the middle of the game. You can't find an SEC defense that wouldn't break if u keep throwing them on the field for 85-90 plays every game. I know we can't score every single drive but we do need to cut those 3 & outs in half. I'm not saying slow down at all I'm saying we need to execute better.With that defense,. 8 wins would be a great season!
I can't say that bc I thought we should've won 10 games with that defense last year. Pitt, OM, & Purdue should've been wins even with our defense. Before the season people thought we had a 4-6 win team at best. There are 8 games on this years schedule, where we will be the more talented team. Then you got Bama, UGA, UF, LSU & a bowl game. We can get to 10 wins by handling our business in the games we're favored and going 2-3 in the 5 big games.We don’t have the defense to win 10 imo I say 7-8 wins