I read perfectly fine. NEED indicates you can't be successful without. No reason for the ad hom. Maybe you need to check a dictionary for what the word "need" means?You obviously can't read.
"we NEED him for this game."
That's what i said word for word. We can still win without him but we still need him as well.
Let's put it this way, without Tilman we are 2-1 right now with probably a blowout loss to Pitt after we went down 10-0 like that.. Cedric Tilman is THAT important to this team.
Last time we beat Florida was with Dobbs to Jennings literally the 2016 version of Hooker and Tilman in many many ways which is crazy to think about.
Wow, another ad hom. I wonder why you got banned before? I wonder why I quit spending so much time on VN about 10 years ago?So if someone says we need our best WR against our biggest rival means that person is implying there is no way possible to win?
Yeah. Think about that one genuis. You have obviously never played any organized sport in your life and clearly can't understand the wording of things in their sentence contexts. If not then don't bring your grammar nazi BS here to twist my meaning.
Tennessee needs all of their best players EVERY game no matter who we play .
In no way did my sentence proclaim we can not win without him. It will just be much more difficult.
What is his injury? If UF is without their best defender and we are missing our best playmaker, then they kind of cancel each other out.
5 players scored TDS in that game. Jennings play was great But not the make or break of the game. If I can trade Tillman for our D not giving up points in the first 27 minutes of the 2nd half I would do it every day.
Florida site says V. Miller practiced today without the non-contact jersey and is gonna play Saturday. They’re a different team with him, I hope our tempo wears their thin defense out
I think the reason everyone got on the Richardson Heisman train was no one expected them to beat Utah.. in fact, most thought they would get rolled over. Because of that no one really thought about the fact that he didn't throw the ball well. Then you have people saying he was dinged up the past few weeks which is why he didn't run the ball is interesting because if that's the truth and he comes at us healthy we will likely see something closer to the AR than played Utah than the one that played UK and USF.I actually think team strength favors UT a little more than that. UT can lose for sure. But I think the Vols have to play poorly and UF has to have its best game of the year by a fairly wide margin.
USF just gave a big part of the blueprint.
I think it is interesting that the one game that got the talking heads going about AR was Utah. He wasn't great throwing the ball. He completed 17/24 for 168 yds and no TD's. IMO, he would have to throw for well over 200 yds and a couple of TD's without any picks. If he does that then their run game can make up the rest of what they need to play well enough on O to win. IOW's, they need to do something they have not done this year.