And the Forum's Collective Head Explodes in 3..2..1 ...

#51
#51
AirVol said:
Do you have a problem with the Brown's being spokes persons for something that no one has been convicted for yet?

Their kid was a thug, he robbed a store minutes before and tried to strong arm a cop that happened to kill him.

You play along with all the race baiters and buy into their game.

If this cop was black, we wouldn't be having this discussion and you know it.
Click to expand...



I said I resent them speaking, already. I'm also on record here doubting the story from Brown's camp. I'm also on record here criticizing the media for their reporting on this and particularly MSNBC's coverage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#52
#52
lawgator1 said:
I said I resent them speaking, already. I'm also on record here doubting the story from Brown's camp. I'm also on record here criticizing the media for their reporting on this and particularly MSNBC's coverage.
Click to expand...

So you are saying your head exploded and that's why you started this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#53
#53
AirVol said:
US Human Rights Network sponsored them.

Not sure if there was a Swahilli translator there at the UN, but I'm certain they were all sitting there saying WTF did she say.
Click to expand...

The Human Rights network is a private organization. They may have sponsored the trip and paid the expenses. But someone at the UN level had to make time on the schedule, get it approved and sign them in.

That was my question. Who specifically set this up at the UN?
 
#54
#54
lawgator1 said:
I said I resent them speaking, already. I'm also on record here doubting the story from Brown's camp. I'm also on record here criticizing the media for their reporting on this and particularly MSNBC's coverage.
Click to expand...

This is true. I do recall a very disgusted Gator blathering on about MSNBC.
 
#55
#55
lawgator1 said:
I said I resent them speaking, already. I'm also on record here doubting the story from Brown's camp. I'm also on record here criticizing the media for their reporting on this and particularly MSNBC's coverage.
Click to expand...

Do you resent your boy Barry showing blatant racism by sending the DOJ there to do their usual ineptness along with his usual racist comments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#57
#57
Grand Vol said:
The Human Rights network is a private organization. They may have sponsored the trip and paid the expenses. But someone at the UN level had to make time on the schedule, get it approved and sign them in.

That was my question. Who specifically set this up at the UN?
Click to expand...

Jay-Z and Beyoncé?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#59
#59
govols/cc said:
Do you resent your boy Barry showing blatant racism by sending the DOJ there to do their usual ineptness along with his usual racist comments?
Click to expand...


No because I think a substantial number of citizens there believe that there is a racial bias in how they are treated by local government, including the police. This incident did not occur in a vacuum. The populace feels that there is a systemic problem.

It is part of the statutory mission of the DOJ to listen to and to investigate such claims. Given what was going on, I had no problem with Holder going there to listen to their grievances.

You seem to think his going there is some sort of endorsement of the Brown version of events. I don't recall him ever saying that was true, or that the officer should be indicted. His comments were measured, and directed at the big picture issues.

That's part of his job and that's the role of the DOJ.

Stop trying to make it more than that.

I'll add that it seems to me that him hearing them out has value in that it addresses and defuses some of the anger. Solve it? No. But neither does it endorse it, which seems to be your real suggestion here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#60
#60
lawgator1 said:
No because I think a substantial number of citizens there believe that there is a racial bias in how they are treated by local government, including the police. This incident did not occur in a vacuum. The populace feels that there is a systemic problem.

It is part of the statutory mission of the DOJ to listen to and to investigate such claims. Given what was going on, I had no problem with Holder going there to listen to their grievances.

You seem to think his going there is some sort of endorsement of the Brown version of events. I don't recall him ever saying that was true, or that the officer should be indicted. His comments were measured, and directed at the big picture issues.

That's part of his job and that's the role of the DOJ.

Stop trying to make it more than that.

I'll add that it seems to me that him hearing them out has value in that it addresses and defuses some of the anger. Solve it? No. But neither does it endorse it, which seems to be your real suggestion here.
Click to expand...

What's the racial makeup of ferguson? This is nothing more than more placing blame on something else rather than accept the truth for what it is. All the DOJ, Obama, & all the other race baiters do is fan flames further delaying addressing the actual issues. Of course that is their constituents so dey does what's dey gots to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#61
#61
govols/cc said:
What's the racial makeup of ferguson? This is nothing more than more placing blame on something else rather than accept the truth for what it is. All the DOJ, Obama, & all the other race baiters do is fan flames further delaying addressing the actual issues. Of course that is their constituents so dey does what's dey gots to.
Click to expand...

How do you get through a day?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top