An open Letter for Fat people.

#101
#101
bamacheats said:
You asked. Could care less if you don't like the answer. But obesity is automatic. Just bring your antidepressant prescription along and its a drive thru window.
Click to expand...

Wait, now you have something against individuals who take anti-depressants?
 
#102
#102
VolsSportsFan said:
Libertarians would say the person has every right to eat, smoke,etc. whatever they want, but would also say that person bears all responsibility for said actions. So if said fatty has health problems and can't work, tough crap.
Click to expand...

I agree with you 100%. I haven't said anything contrary to this.
 
#104
#104
bamacheats said:
You asked. Could care less if you don't like the answer. But obesity is automatic. Just bring your antidepressant prescription along and its a drive thru window.
Click to expand...
Please provide proof for your claim that obesity equals automatic disability payments.
 
#105
#105
therealUT said:
She chose to drive.
Click to expand...

And had the right to assume that the "law enforcement" that she helped pay for could keep a 4 time repeat DUI offender from driving again while stoned on oxycontin. But alas, they were out giving a sober citizen a speeding ticket about 500 yards away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#107
#107
bamacheats said:
And had the right to assume that the "law enforcement" that she helped pay for could keep a 4 time repeat DUI offender from driving again while stoned on oxycontin. But alas, they were out giving a sober citizen a speeding ticket about 500 yards away.
Click to expand...

She still chose to get on the road. Why should I take responsibility for her choice (this is your argument against obesity, correct)?
 
#108
#108
bamacheats said:
You asked. Could care less if you don't like the answer. But obesity is automatic. Just bring your antidepressant prescription along and its a drive thru window.
Click to expand...

quick subject change but did you know could care less and couldn't care less are interchangeable......ok back to fatties
 
#111
#111
therealUT said:
Wait, now you have something against individuals who take anti-depressants?
Click to expand...

I'm disappointmented UT. Generally you have good arguments. You're failing in this one. First marathons vs obesity. Smoking prevents alzheimers. Now you're trying to create another by claiming I said something that I didn't. Off your game today UT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#116
#116
I'm going to go back throughout this thread and give bamacheats a "VN Like" on every one of his posts to make him feel better.
 
#117
#117
rockytophigh said:
You are EXACTLY the kind of "man" John Wayne would have kicked in the sack. Live your life dude, enjoy some things, quit worrying about what other people do to increase your healthcare premiums....stop worrying that out of balance tires on your neighbor's car are causing potholes on your street, thus causing higher taxes.....just stop, man up, go build something, weld something, kill a small animal but for goodness sake stop being a freaking woman and quit yer bit****.

I think if you'll take this to heart, we could move on to the other whiny men in this country....one at a time....and take our society back.
Click to expand...

LOL...John Wayne....yeah, ok.
 
#120
#120
therealUT said:
She still chose to get on the road. Why should I take responsibility for her choice (this is your argument against obesity, correct)?
Click to expand...

Roads are a community agreement operated by government. The privelege to drive only requires obeying traffic laws. Not even a need to help fund them.

Someone obeys traffic laws, also helps maintain them by taxes, is harmed by someone who does neither, reserves the right to use a service, (disability), that was set up for this very purpose.

Obesity is a choice to be unhealthy, just like taking multiple doses of oxycontin is a choice to be unhealthy. Different severity, but both tied to addiction, which is often emotional distress.

The group that chooses to be unhealthy doesn't have the right to harm the others. Claiming discrimination is saying that they have that right. Thats anti-libertarian.
 
#125
#125
bamacheats said:
Roads are a community agreement operated by government. The privelege to drive only requires obeying traffic laws. Not even a need to help fund them.

Someone obeys traffic laws, also helps maintain them by taxes, is harmed by someone who does neither, reserves the right to use a service, (disability), that was set up for this very purpose.

Obesity is a choice to be unhealthy, just like taking multiple doses of oxycontin is a choice to be unhealthy. Different severity, but both tied to addiction, which is often emotional distress.

The group that chooses to be unhealthy doesn't have the right to harm the others. Claiming discrimination is saying that they have that right. Thats anti-libertarian.
Click to expand...

I hate people that make choices which end in them getting in accidents. Your mom made a choice that had inherent risks in it and she deserved what she got; I should not have to pay for it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top