Amateur Hour Continues

#34,026
#34,026
Septic said:
baited breath
Click to expand...
200.gif
 
#34,027
#34,027
Orangeslice13 said:
I’m so disappointed in how far you’ve fallen.

Show me any post I’ve made that says I think the election results will change based on fraud.
Actually I’ve said too many times to count that I don’t think they will change.
My objection to this process has been any fraud and the perception that it’s wide spread. Your method of ridicule and inaccurate information only stokes the flames.

I believe that if the process is allowed to play out that it will eventually prove that there was fraud but not enough to change the results of the election. The results being election reform before the next election.
Small fraud left unchecked leads to big fraud.

what I don’t understand is the Biden supporters being so ready to ignore fraud. It’s very much like the Obama stance that the Russians could not interfere in the elections and then doing nothing to address that potential problem. Now 4 years later we have people who still believe the Russians did it. I on the other hand want to review every claim and learn from them to prevent future problems. It boggles my mind that people like you would rather play it off instead of addressing a legitimate potential problem.
Click to expand...
First, you show me where I claimed you said “I think the election results will change based on fraud.” I didn’t.

All I’ve done is correct your lies about things that I said. And I’m doing it again.

It’s getting boring, which why I asked if you had anything honest to contribute. A simple “no” would have sufficed.

Nobody is ignoring fraud. Quit being hysterical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#34,029
#34,029
Septic said:
Who would have thought that Donny would refuse to accept reality and instead insert his own?
Click to expand...
True to character, he's doing this. Unfortunately for him, the ballots, like the virus, will not wither away like the conscience of the GOP party did.
 
#34,030
#34,030
Every state has a process for prevention, deterrence, detection, and prosecution of fraud that plays out before, during, and after every election.

Those safeguards are what was deemed sufficient by each state’s legislature. We just had a 4 year national deliberation about whether those safeguards were sufficient. This election was the direct result of that deliberation.

Absent some specific evidence of fraud on a scale that would overturn the election, those safeguards are all that is needed to stand for the fairness and validity of the election.

Without supporting evidence, a claim that those safeguards are insufficient to ensure the election’s legitimacy is a disagreement with the process by which they were agreed upon. That is to say, it’s a disagreement with our constitutional form of government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40
#34,033
#34,033
Velo Vol said:
True to character, he's doing this. Unfortunately for him, the ballots, like the virus, will not wither away like the conscience of the GOP party did.
Click to expand...

It's a bit humorous that he poisoned the well long before the first ballot was even cast and otherwise rational adults don't realize that they're drinking from it.

Truthfully, I hope trump keeps it up - I'd love to seem him 'escorted' from the White House while Joe tosses his sht from the balcony.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#34,035
#34,035
RockyTop85 said:
First, you show me where I claimed you said “I think the election results will change based on fraud.” I didn’t.

All I’ve done is correct your lies about things that I said. And I’m doing it again.

It’s getting boring, which why I asked if you had anything honest to contribute. A simple “no” would have sufficed.

Nobody is ignoring fraud. Quit being hysterical.
Click to expand...
4BA1DA25-5E90-4F1D-9CC9-EA521ADD8C05.gif
 
#34,038
#34,038
RockyTop85 said:
First, you show me where I claimed you said “I think the election results will change based on fraud.” I didn’t.

All I’ve done is correct your lies about things that I said. And I’m doing it again.

It’s getting boring, which why I asked if you had anything honest to contribute. A simple “no” would have sufficed.

Nobody is ignoring fraud. Quit being hysterical.
Click to expand...
I’m interested in what lies you’ve corrected.
Post them up please.
 
#34,042
#34,042
Orangeslice13 said:
You call someone a liar you should be able to back it up. Because all you’ve done so far is pitch a fit and make false accusations while crying about supposed false accusations.
State your case.
Click to expand...
Well, I already did that in the posts where I corrected your lies the first time (which makes the second half of this post another lie).

I haven’t checked, but I assume those posts are still here, so I’m not sure why I would need to go back and bump them. Is your browser malfunctioning?
 
#34,043
#34,043
RockyTop85 said:
Well, I already did that in the posts where I corrected your lies the first time (which makes the second half of this post another lie).

I haven’t checked, but I assume those posts are still here, so I’m not sure why I would need to go back and bump them. Is your browser malfunctioning?
Click to expand...
That’s what I thought
You’ve got nothing but false accusations.
You’ve never corrected a single thing I’ve posted.
Sad how far you’ve fallen.
Seeing Trump is like looking in the mirror for you
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#34,045
#34,045
Orangeslice13 said:
That’s what I thought
You’ve got nothing but false accusations.
You’ve never corrected a single thing I’ve posted.
Sad how far you’ve fallen.
Click to expand...
Lol. I’ve done it twice in just the last two pages. Being drunk this early in the day is a sign of alcoholism. You should get help.

What format do you want them in?
>What I actually said
>what you claimed I said
>me correcting what you claimed I said?

How far back do you want to go because just bumping what’s on the last two pages seems like a tremendous waste of time.

How many do I need to convince you to change your handle to OrangeLies?
 
#34,046
#34,046
TennesseeTopHat said:
Foxnews argued in court, successfully, that no reasonable person would take tucker carlson seriously. So there’s that. Here’s a link You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers
Click to expand...
It's a defense the opinion show hosts use. Which is why people shouldn't watch Maddow, Carlson, ect and expect to be getting honest news. It's just an opinion on what they want you to think.

Media lawyers note this is not the first time this sort of defense has been offered. A $10 million libel lawsuit filed by the owners of One America News Network against MSNBC's top star, Rachel Maddow, was dismissed in May when the judge ruled she had stretched the established facts allowably: "The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
#34,047
#34,047
RockyTop85 said:
Lol. I’ve done it twice in just the last two pages. Being drunk this early in the day is a sign of alcoholism. You should get help.

What format do you want them in?
>What I actually said
>what you claimed I said
>me correcting what you claimed I said?

How far back do you want to go because just bumping what’s on the last two pages seems like a tremendous waste of time.

How many do I need to convince you to change your handle to OrangeLies?
Click to expand...
Post them up.
Quit deflecting. Admit your mistakes Or Quote them. It shouldn’t be too hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#34,048
#34,048
Orangeslice13 said:
Post them up.
Quit deflecting. Admit your mistakes Or Quote them. It shouldn’t be too hard.
Click to expand...
What I said:
RockyTop85 said:
So yes, there is still absolutely zero evidence of voter fraud to a degree that would change the election.
Click to expand...
What you claimed I said:
Orangeslice13 said:
“Zero evidence of fraud” makes you a hack.
Click to expand...
Me correcting you:
RockyTop85 said:
“absolutely zero evidence of voter fraud to a degree that would change the election*.”
Click to expand...

There’s one. Should I continue?
 
#34,050
#34,050
RockyTop85 said:
What I said:

What you claimed I said:

Me correcting you:


There’s one. Should I continue?
Click to expand...

Got it. You’re disingenuous.
RockyTop85 said:
There’s no proof of “other than properly” anything. State law allowed for some states to send out unsolicited ballots. There was nothing done improperly. Still your turn.
Click to expand...

Here’s one of your “there’s no proof” screeches. Summarizing your thoughts to reply to them is hardly lies. But you knew that already.

And further down the hole he goes.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top