Amateur Hour Continues

Many still haven't gotten over Obama's divisive 'being half black' policy.

The majority don’t care about what color his skin is just what his action or lack of actions were to cause the division . To pull the race card and use it is weak sauce . He didn’t get special consideration for being black and he’s not going to get a pass either just from being black .
 
The majority don’t care about what color his skin is just what his action or lack of actions were to cause the division . To pull the race card and use it is weak sauce . He didn’t get special consideration for being black and he’s not going to get a pass either just from being black .
The majority may not have cared. Many definitely did care, including some on this board.
 
Can't wait for Lynn Cheney's "Trump is right to put America first" statement.




He would have more credibility if he had any clue what he is doing. As usual, he got on the phone with someone who kisses his azz and promised to say nice things about him and he changed US policy on a whim. Idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
Irrelevant.
Trumps not paying his bills to cities his already held rallies at.


This can go two ways: extortion or denying freedom of speech. When you charge one campaign $20K and and other $500+K, there's simply no way you can claim that ten years can make that kind of difference. Either it is simple extortion, or it is an attempt to deny one party the freedom of speech. Neither is legal, and neither should be considered acceptable.
 
The majority may not have cared. Many definitely did care, including some on this board.

Sure thing. When you can't accept that not everyone agrees with a person's policies and his skin isn't lily white, then obviously those dissenting people must be racists.
 
Sure thing. When you can't accept that not everyone agrees with a person's policies and his skin isn't lily white, then obviously those dissenting people must be racists.
No, but when you use the word Hussein as a slur, you probably are a bigot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
This can go two ways: extortion or denying freedom of speech. When you charge one campaign $20K and and other $500+K, there's simply no way you can claim that ten years can make that kind of difference. Either it is simple extortion, or it is an attempt to deny one party the freedom of speech. Neither is legal, and neither should be considered acceptable.
Well the arena backed down.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7372b2-e9cb-11e9-85c0-85a098e47b37_story.html
 
This can go two ways: extortion or denying freedom of speech. When you charge one campaign $20K and and other $500+K, there's simply no way you can claim that ten years can make that kind of difference. Either it is simple extortion, or it is an attempt to deny one party the freedom of speech. Neither is legal, and neither should be considered acceptable.
It is not extortion.
 

VN Store



Back
Top