Amateur Hour Continues

The founding fathers never intended federal employees to live somewhere and vote and stuff.

DyztlFWXgAUyLbe.jpg
In the historical sense he is 100% correct.
 
No, he‘s just a life long Republican who hates the fact his party is currently dominated by dementia Donald and his ilk.
Only reason he was hired was to join the left wing hacks to bash the President. If he praised and agreed with Trump 0% chance he's hired. The only time they will bring him on is when they are looking for a so called R to trash him.
 
All three are nothing but propaganda outlets, they don't report facts unless the fact supports the narrative being pushed by the executives in charge. The sooner you come to understand that there is NO true network "news" outlets the better off you will be. Watch them all and boil it down for yourself, somewhere in the middle might be some facts and truth.
False equivalency. CNN fact checks the president. Hannity calls Trump at night to tell him how much he loves him.
 
In his defense, 9 a.m. is awfully early to be up and dressed and stuff.

He clearly just misread the teleprompter...unless Stephen "Mr. Burns" Miller wrote the speech, in which case Miller may have just had a Freudian slip while drafting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
False equivalency. CNN fact checks the president. Hannity calls Trump at night to tell him how much he loves him.

Of course they do , if they fact checked the stories they aired , they would be out of business . In all fairness their ratings couldn’t get much worse than they are now lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
I just can’t get past the abismal ratings thing . If a news organization was indeed trustworthy and doing the job news organizations are supposed to do , logic dictates their ratinging would be the highest or at least top two . Ratings = viewers = Trust = Sucessful Business in TV news land . Being on the bottom of that ratio is bad and I just can’t figure out how you guys spin it any other way for it to make sense .
 
I just can’t get past the abismal ratings thing . If a news organization was indeed trustworthy and doing the job news organizations are supposed to do , logic dictates their ratinging would be the highest or at least top two . Ratings = viewers = Trust = Sucessful Business in TV news land . Being on the bottom of that ratio is bad and I just can’t figure out how you guys spin it any other way for it to make sense .

I think it has more to do with the target audiences than quality and trustworthiness. CNN and MSNBC are targeting the liberal market which tends to be uninformed and prefer to get their brand of propaganda from twatter and late night comedy shows. Fox News is targeting the more mature crowd who still looks to network news for their preferred propaganda source.
 
I think it has more to do with the target audiences than quality and trustworthiness. CNN and MSNBC are targeting the liberal market which tends to be uninformed and prefer to get their brand of propaganda from twatter and late night comedy shows. Fox News is targeting the more mature crowd who still looks to network news for their preferred propaganda source.

Makes sense . So CNNs viewship is dying because the younger generation would rather believe a post or tweet over a journalist . Looks like in that case they can’t afford to put out any fake stories ( I mean unvarified ) .

Edit: I was really just trolling a little , I know the die hards believe everything CNN&MSNBC puts out . You can see it in their posts here in the form of talking points .
 
If a news organization was indeed trustworthy and doing the job news organizations are supposed to do , logic dictates their ratinging would be the highest or at least top two . Ratings = viewers = Trust = Sucessful Business in TV news land .

Straight news doesn't get great ratings. How many "news" shows are there in prime time?

They're talk/entertainment.
 

VN Store



Back
Top