Amateur Hour Continues

So here lies your dilemma. In one thread you argue that there is some truth in the Steele dossier therefore it’s factual and here you argue that open border supporters do not support MS13 even though that’s exactly what MS13 members rely on to infiltrate this country.

Of course I see the pettiness of a POTUS carrying on like this, but damned if I care as long as he’s getting you and your crybaby, socially deficient, honorless ilk pissed off. You aren’t right about much and you probably lose 95% of your cases. Thats if you’re even an attorney IRL

:pinch: Ouch.
 
Last edited:
So here lies your dilemma. In one thread you argue that there is some truth in the Steele dossier therefore it’s factual and here you argue that open border supporters do not support MS13 even though that’s exactly what MS13 members rely on to infiltrate this country.

Of course I see the pettiness of a POTUS carrying on like this, but damned if I care as long as he’s getting you and your crybaby, socially deficient, honorless ilk pissed off. You aren’t right about much and you probably lose 95% of your cases. Thats if you’re even an attorney IRL

There's no connection between the two. You hire someone like Steele to discover facts, not make up stories. If you want someone to make up a story out of thin air you do what Trump did and go to your buddy at the National Enquirer. Steele may get some things wrong--some of the entries were based on layers of hearsay and some may have been deliberate attempts to sow disinformation by Russia--but it makes zero sense for him to intentionally concoct stories that have no factual support. Why would his client want that? You get that, right?

Onto Harris. Being opposed to the Zero Tolerance policy is not open borders, and it certainly doesn't mean you "support" MS13. Show me anything where she has come out in support of MS13. It's a complete crock and you all all know it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
So here lies your dilemma. In one thread you argue that there is some truth in the Steele dossier therefore it’s factual and here you argue that open border supporters do not support MS13 even though that’s exactly what MS13 members rely on to infiltrate this country.

Of course I see the pettiness of a POTUS carrying on like this, but damned if I care as long as he’s getting you and your crybaby, socially deficient, honorless ilk pissed off. You aren’t right about much and you probably lose 95% of your cases. Thats if you’re even an attorney IRL

Cornbread
(The new boom)
 
:birgits_giggle:

Someone is jealous

When you're giving advice to someone on a message board you don't know at all about someone else you don't know at all, you might want to worry about yourself more so than a nobody like me. Thanks anyway for continuing to expose yourself as a proud member of the DDOA club
I have no idea what DDOA is stud. I'm a proud American and I am proud of what THIS president is doing for this country.


#winning <------ me.

#sulking <------- you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
You're a trip dude. You waited on a headline that suited your taste and then posted it. After this story had already been posted and you didn't touch it earlier.

Lulz

Had to wait for the talking points to come out so he would know how to respond
 
You're a trip dude. You waited on a headline that suited your taste and then posted it. After this story had already been posted and you didn't touch it earlier.

Lulz

Don't know the earlier post you're talking about. But if I saw a Muslim name and you talking about it, I probably just assumed it was some islamophobic diatribe and moved on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

"Particularly, the government has found no evidence that your client illegally removed House data from the House network or from House members' offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus server, stole or destroyed House information technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferred government information, including classified or sensitive information," the prosecution said in the plea deal.

Prosecutors said the government conducted a “thorough investigation of those allegations.”

The government interviewed 40 witnesses, took custody of the House Democratic Caucus server and other devices, reviewed electronic communications between House employees and questioned Awan during multiple voluntary interviews, the plea deal said.

It still leaves the DNC hacks hanging out there.
 
He's got me pretty much pegged. But as a smartass with an actual 3 handicap who can read his pre-edited posts when he calls me out but loses his nerve and edits, I felt obligated to respond.

Game, Set.....Match.
 
Did anyone believe the Feds would allow all of those Dems to look like the complete idiots they are?
 
Did anyone believe the Feds would allow all of those Dems to look like the complete idiots they are?

This is the classic conspiracy theory move once the conspiracy theory has come apart--the one bringing forth evidence blowing up the conspiracy theory is really in on it too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This is the classic conspiracy theory move once the conspiracy theory has come apart--the one bringing forth evidence blowing up the conspiracy theory is really in on it too.

It's common sense.... they fabricate a plea deal..., guy goes to prison.... the Dems don't get publicly humiliated..... it was a BS investigation.
I don't believe anything I read or hear that originates in the beltway
 
It's common sense.... they fabricate a plea deal..., guy goes to prison.... the Dems don't get publicly humiliated..... it was a BS investigation.
I don't believe anything I read or hear that originates in the beltway

Calling William of Ockham. Calling William of Ockham. Mr. Pickens needs a shave. Please bring your razor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Twitter

Sorry, this is too rich. Brags about how he's written great books (his books had ghost writers, so that's a lie) and prides himself on his writing ability, but then claims that the press likes to "pour over" his tweets looking for errors. I wonder what the press is pouring over his tweets. Gravy? Pancake syrup?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Twitter

Sorry, this is too rich. Brags about how he's written great books (his books had ghost writers, so that's a lie) and prides himself on his writing ability, but then claims that the press likes to "pour over" his tweets looking for errors. I wonder what the press is pouring over his tweets. Gravy? Pancake syrup?

Get a life......
 

Yeah because as we all know, when an investigation was conducted by the government, well it is always honest.

So this guy was barred in Feb of 2017 for violating security rules. Hmmm, there seems to be a nother dem that violated national security rules with an email server. Even when the director of the FBI stated, under oath mind you, that those violations happened, nothing was done.

To think that an investigative team comprised of government employees is somehow honest and just is just insane. But we should expect no less from the democrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Twitter

Sorry, this is too rich. Brags about how he's written great books (his books had ghost writers, so that's a lie) and prides himself on his writing ability, but then claims that the press likes to "pour over" his tweets looking for errors. I wonder what the press is pouring over his tweets. Gravy? Pancake syrup?

Trump troll level.

Expert...
 
Twitter

Sorry, this is too rich. Brags about how he's written great books (his books had ghost writers, so that's a lie) and prides himself on his writing ability, but then claims that the press likes to "pour over" his tweets looking for errors. I wonder what the press is pouring over his tweets. Gravy? Pancake syrup?
Computer wipes?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top