Amanda Knox

#452
#452
Wonder if she thinks the Nike deal was good for Tennessee? :)
 
#454
#454
Toujours Pret said:
If she likes it, sandvol will be here posting 'studies' that show we should've gone with LA Gear
Click to expand...

:lolabove: His "studies" are usually truncated and are suspiciously similar to inflexible OPINIONS. :w00t:
 
#455
#455
Mods can there be a rule that whenever this thread gets bumped for any reason that pictures must be added? Thanks

Knox+appears+in+court+hFrj_RrboUSl.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#457
#457
Appreciation for your opinion. I spent 10 proving she's innocent. :)
 
#460
#460
alexmanu said:
She's guilty IMO (just thought I'd add my two cents...).
Click to expand...

Suffering the same delusions as your hot blooded Italian Euro-bretheren, I see. In the words of the great James Franco:"They hate us 'cause they anus!" Now go get some braces, you Monarch loving brit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#465
#465
Sandvol said:
http://www.amazon.com/As-Done-Unto-...pebp=1437284607852&perid=1DMBV3M9GGF7XR63P7G7

Another book exposing Amanda Knox's lies. Over the years you'll see many books on the subject. Few will be pro Knox. The truth is easy. It is when you have to remember all your lies it is difficult.
Click to expand...

I appreciate your right to your opinion, but you couldn't be more wrong about the truth being easy. Getting 5 witnesses who saw the exact same thing to have entirely consistent testimony is nearly impossible. Truth is just as hard to track as a lie. I honestly don't care if she did it or not. Bringing up books that support your theory is just fine...but realize that others are entitled to their opinions and they have an equal number of books "proving" her innocence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#466
#466
mjw2e said:
I appreciate your right to your opinion, but you couldn't be more wrong about the truth being easy. Getting 5 witnesses who saw the exact same thing to have entirely consistent testimony is nearly impossible. Truth is just as hard to track as a lie. I honestly don't care if she did it or not. Bringing up books that support your theory is just fine...but realize that others are entitled to their opinions and they have an equal number of books "proving" her innocence.
Click to expand...

No it's the liars who have trouble keeping track of their lies.
 
#471
#471
#473
#473
Sandvol said:
You mean other than that they were both adjacent to Meredith Kercher when she expired?
Click to expand...

Lol. This whole case you were touting the virtues of the Italian court system. Now... They surely screwed it up and let a blood thirsty killer with a nice rack off the hook.

If she were guilty, she would be in prison. They tried every dirty trick in the book to nail her to a cross, and they couldn't find a hammer that was big enough to get the job done. She didn't do it.

Metaphorically speaking, You're in a straight jacket in a padded room singing Tone Loc tunes while pacing back and forth and sporadically banging your head against the walls. You don't make sense to anyone except yourself. Time to move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#474
#474
SamRebel35 said:
Lol. This whole case you were touting the virtues of the Italian court system. Now... They surely screwed it up and let a blood thirsty killer with a nice rack off the hook.

If she were guilty, she would be in prison. They tried every dirty trick in the book to nail her to a cross, and they couldn't find a hammer that was big enough to get the job done. She didn't do it.

Metaphorically speaking, You're in a straight jacket in a padded room singing Tone Loc tunes while pacing back and forth and sporadically banging your head against the walls. You don't make sense to anyone except yourself. Time to move on.
Click to expand...

The local trial judges are excellent. The higher up the case goes just like our Supreme Court then the more likely politics gets involved. No system is perfect but the initial lower court had it correct. He was a very thoughtful and careful judge who weighed all the evidence and came to the proper conclusion. By the way you seem like a smart person but you haven't said one intelligent thing about this case. I suspect it is because you really haven't studied the facts of the case.
 
#475
#475
Also, by the way, the Court of Cassation, the Italian Supreme Court, is required to issue a report of their findings within 90 days of their ruling. They haven't done that in this case. Odd, don't you think? All of Italy is waiting.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top