Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 46,736
- Likes
- 48,162
If you had to give a number, what number do you consider, as they say, “F you!” money? That definition to me is that someone is set up so well that their current situation does not diminish at all as they move into retirement, but likely continues to improve, where they can handle any expense that may come up, be it renovations, new car, vacations, continue their normal hobbies and activities, insurance increases, medical bills, etc., with their retirement savings generating about 5-7% return annually to live off of and barely ever touch your principal.
The top 1% of US households are worth $13.7 million. For the top 10% it’s $1.9 million. The median household income is $75k.
The Bernies and Beths have big problems with the wealth gap and want to create oppressive, envy taxes on the wealthiest. But the wealthiest already donate plenty to charities without the government bureaucrats inserting themselves into the process as intermediaries. The bottom 50% of earners pay no federal income taxes and most of those live in nice homes and drive nice cars. Everybody isn’t entitled to a 10,000 SF home on the lake with a garage full of Corvettes, Ferraris, and luxury cars with a SunSeeker and a Donzi or 2 parked at their dock.
The Beths and Bernies want to keep the club at the top even more exclusive. Why would it be a problem if there are 30,000 billionaires instead of almost 3,000?