AJ "The Beast" Johnson

#1

Hoss Diesel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,185
Likes
20
#1
Just a heads up. I've been talking to some of AJ's friends & they said that his nickname that he's been going by is "The Beast" & that he is living up to the nickname.

Can't wait to see The Beast win the East.


:rock: :rock:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 people
#3
#3
Considering how well he and Maggitt played last year, this year's starting LBs have the potential to be scary good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#6
#6
I've met the guy, he's actually really calm and actually pretty cool. I wouldn't really call call him a beast, more like a gentle beast lol
 
#8
#8
Considering how well he and Maggitt played last year, this year's starting LBs have the potential to be scary good.

They were well below average last year--slow to react and with countless missed assignments. I think they will improve, but it is silly to say they were good. Hopefully they have the potential to be at SEC level this year. Apparently you people have forgotten what good football looks like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
They were well below average last year--slow to react and with countless missed assignments. I think they will improve, but it is silly to say they were good. Hopefully they have the potential to be at SEC level this year. Apparently you people have forgotten what good football looks like.

Were they all conference? No, but both being true freshmen starting in the SEC, its unfair to say they were below average.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#10
#10
They were well below average last year--slow to react and with countless missed assignments. I think they will improve, but it is silly to say they were good. Hopefully they have the potential to be at SEC level this year. Apparently you people have forgotten what good football looks like.





That's absurd - they were freshmen and they played better than alot of sophmores and juniors around the league. AJ may have been the best player we got singned in that class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#11
#11
They were well below average last year--slow to react and with countless missed assignments. I think they will improve, but it is silly to say they were good. Hopefully they have the potential to be at SEC level this year. Apparently you people have forgotten what good football looks like.

^Well played sir...Maggit and Johnson will only be sophomores this year. However, last year we had one of the worse linebacking corps in the sec. Playing at an average sec level would be an improvement.
 
#12
#12
That's absurd - they were freshmen and they played better than alot of sophmores and juniors around the league. AJ may have been the best player we got singned in that class.

They played the way good prospects should play as freshmen starting in the SEC. No better and no worse. I think they will be the most improved unit on the team this year. But it is crazy to say they were "good" last year.
 
#13
#13
Were they all conference? No, but both being true freshmen starting in the SEC, its unfair to say they were below average.

In comparison to the rest of the league's LBs, yes, they were below average. I realize they were freshman, which is why there is reason for some optimism.
 
#15
#15
I guess Freshman ALL SEC = below average

Dind-ding-ding. Exactly. In this league most freshmen don't play. A team with a lot of freshmen All-SEC is often a team with a losing record.

We are comparing these guys to SEC talent. Not the other freshmen around the league that couldn't crack the starting lineup due to depth. And I don't see a Dont'a Hightower on this roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
Ummm, I wasnt trying to prove your point. I was trying to show you exactly how wrong your post is saying that they were "below average". JMO
 
#18
#18
Ummm, I wasnt trying to prove your point. I was trying to show you exactly how wrong your post is saying that they were "below average". JMO

I know dude. That wasn't lost one me.

But you guys are missing my overall point about how our LBs need to work on being SEC average before they work on being "scary good."

It's okay though. GBO.
 
#20
#20
They were well below average last year--slow to react and with countless missed assignments. I think they will improve, but it is silly to say they were good. Hopefully they have the potential to be at SEC level this year. Apparently you people have forgotten what good football looks like.

Did you expect them to play like All-Americans? Come on, man. I didn't read all the other responses below your post, but I think that's pretty far-fetched to say they were below-average, especially with what this team had to work with (and with Wilcox as DC).
 
#21
#21
In comparison to the rest of the league's LBs, yes, they were below average. I realize they were freshman, which is why there is reason for some optimism.

So if you're comparing them to the rest of the league, which you stated are usually not freshmen, then they are anything but average or below. They are playing well above where they should be at this point. jmo
 
#22
#22
They played the way good prospects should play as freshmen starting in the SEC. No better and no worse. I think they will be the most improved unit on the team this year. But it is crazy to say they were "good" last year.

If Fade Route is calling your post absurd; you should take a good long look it the mirror cause something just ain't right with you. Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#23
#23
With Lathers back this unit should be pretty good,,, They missed LATHERS last year and it showed, :good!:
 
#24
#24
AJ and Maggitt were excellent as FRESHMEN. All FRESHMEN SEC, I believe. They played like freshmen at times. They will get better and possibly be among the best LBs in the SEC, but not last year.
 
#25
#25
Still think we have a lot of questions at LB outside of Maggitt, Lathers and AJ. Maybe I'm missing something but I'm both excited and concerned about this group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement



Back
Top