ThunderVol11
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 294
- Likes
- 18
I don't care about other teams. Also other teams don't lose most of their coaching staff to backwards moves over the course of an offseason.
Take the Dooley shades off champ.
How is it two different things?
Guy (potentially) transfers, presumably due to issues on the team. You appear to blame everything 100% on Dooley, then act like it's some huge deal and going to make the team worse off, despite having plenty of resources to replace him. You say we'll be worse off, I'll say it's for the better because he was a terrible influence on the team. Sometimes losing these talented guys ends up focusing everyone else. Where's the disparity?
I don't care about other teams. Also other teams don't lose most of their coaching staff to backwards moves over the course of an offseason.
Take the Dooley shades off champ.
This is a thread very specifically about transfers and player stability, and I provided a link indicating that these issues are not synonymous with Tennessee football.
You are using player movement as part of an argument to indicate instability, which is not reasonable. End of story.
I blame the endless instability on Dooley, yes. The lack of control and inability to show any continuity among coaches and players time and time again. That is on him.
We don't have plenty of resources to replace an All-SEC Sophomore receiver. No one does. Stop smoking crack. Yes, DR is clearly a head case, but he can play, and it's about playing football.
You don't care that the same things happen to other teams? You don't care the teams like Bama and LSU and USC and almost every other SEC school replaced almost as many coaches as we did? Yet you continue to point fingers at CDD as if our situation is unique? This is part of college football and the staff is handling it well as far as we can tell.
Again, and I've said this a bazillion times, it isn't blind allegiance to Dooley, it is an understanding of what it takes to rebuild an organization from the bottom up that allows most of us so called sunshine pumpers to be positive and appreciate the improvements we see. Those who have been against Dooley from the beginning continue to look for the smallest flaws as evidence of failure and that is just sad.
I do, but I usually follow it from a National level in the offseason, and yet UT is always in the headlines for this stuff.
You don't care that the same things happen to other teams? You don't care the teams like Bama and LSU and USC and almost every other SEC school replaced almost as many coaches as we did? Yet you continue to point fingers at CDD as if our situation is unique? This is part of college football and the staff is handling it well as far as we can tell.
Again, and I've said this a bazillion times, it isn't blind allegiance to Dooley, it is an understanding of what it takes to rebuild an organization from the bottom up that allows most of us so called sunshine pumpers to be positive and appreciate the improvements we see. Those who have been against Dooley from the beginning continue to look for the smallest flaws as evidence of failure and that is just sad.
Then I will close with the simple fact that if you see 12 headlines of kids getting suspended, arrested, joining cults etc, you will focus on the 1 that was from UT. Unless you can provide me data that shows more kids leave UT(for reasons not related to head coaching changes) than other big time D1 schools then I would say your subjective focus has led you astray.