Nope, not at all. I'd just like to see our football program, of which he is in charge of, show some sign of stability for at least a month. That'd be amazing.
I guess you just conveniently skipped over the article about Georgia and their roster issues.
I'll post it for you, since you're probably too lazy to look it up.
Roster attrition occurring at alarming rate for Georgia football | UGA sports blog
Name calling is easy when your reasoning is so pathetic it subjects you to it.
Da'rick has been an issue for the team the entire time he's been here. If nothing else, it kicks a guy out who was lazy and wouldn't do what he needed to do to be a member of the team. Most of the time it's better to get those guys away. If you can't grasp that tiny, beautiful tidbit, I feel a little pity for your mental capability.
I guess you just conveniently skipped over the article about Georgia and their roster issues.
I'll post it for you, since you're probably too lazy to look it up.
Roster attrition occurring at alarming rate for Georgia football | UGA sports blog
Transfers and player issues happen all of the time.
Your laser sharp reasoning can't see we are arguing two different points.
I'm not against kicking a guy off a team who is a cancer. That should happen. If that guy happens to be a big time playmaker who was responsible for most of our offense last year, I'm not under the delusion it makes our team better though. It doesn't. He's a good player, and I wish the relationship didn't go this way, like it has with many other players in recent years.
Your laser sharp reasoning can't see we are arguing two different points.
I'm not against kicking a guy off a team who is a cancer. That should happen. If that guy happens to be a big time playmaker who was responsible for most of our offense last year, I'm not under the delusion it makes our team better though. It doesn't. He's a good player, and I wish the relationship didn't go this way, like it has with many other players in recent years.