tm3
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,664
- Likes
- 671
You pointed out a great fact. The people that cry the most on here do not understand football. They show it when they start spouting their nonsense.From practice videos/reports that I've seen, Bajakian mainly worked with the QBs and WRs. DeBord is the freaking offensive coordinator, which means he's gonna work with the entire offense. Yes, he's also the QB coach now, but he still has a hand in the receivers, running backs, and offensive line. You obviously don't know football very well.:bad:
You pointed out a great fact. The people that cry the most on here do not understand football. They show it when they start spouting their nonsense.
Once again, Butch plainly stated that the system was not going to change. That is why there was no flashy guy hired.
It is obvious that Jones and the UTAD have gone to some extra trouble to sell the fan base on the DeBord hire. First, they intentionally waited until after signing day to make the announcement, because they knew the fan reaction would be bad. Second, in the UT announcement, Jones doesn't even mention his time coaching with the DeBord. That's no accident: I think the coach didn't want to highlight their old friendship. Third, how about that DeBord quote about how he wanted to be "selective" about the job he took. Really? He's selling that line but I'm not buying it--he's been out of coaching for years.
Also, how about all those quotes from former michigan players about what a genius DeBord is! Never seen that before. Jones had a chance to go out and get a good spread/read-option coordinator. Instead, he he barely went through the motions of a search and took the easy route of hiring an old coaching crony from the Lloyd Carr era who needed a job. Hope it works out...
On behalf of all sane University of TENNESSEE fans,, I would first like to welcome Coach DeBord and secondly apologize for the nonsense found in this and other threads featuring people who think they know more than they actually do.
Debord was a great OC at Michigan . There are alot of variables as to why he would run a power running based offense at Michigan..the two cheif reasons 1 ) Carr 2 ) awesome defense. No reason to throw it around the yard when the other team can't score
Why would we need a 'read option' guy ? We dont run a 'read option' offense ...we run a decidedly pro style 'gap scheme ' offense that is predicated off the west coast passing game and the dive running game. We run about 3 'zone read ' plays a game . No worries , if we decide to run more , there is no need for an 'expert'. It is a freakin high school offense . We could consult with any number of high school coaches that run the wing-t for an expert opinion
I dont think it is any coincidence that Butch hired a guy that has a level of expertise with the Oline and Tight ends. Butch's offense is predicated off of TE's and power running . You have not seen that yet because we havent had any TEs . When we get 3 or 4 TEs , you will see the real offense and not the ad lib you have seen thus far .
Even if the system does not change you still can hire a great OC. When Cut took over for Sanders he ran the same offense but it was night and days BETTER under Cut. The great OCs are able to execute the offense on a different level and take the same players who sucked the year before and make them better. That is why DeBord has not been an OC for 7 years, he is not on the level of a Cutcliffe. DeBord ran CMU's program into the ground and I would be willing to bet he does the same thing with our offense. He would have been an OK choice for OL or TE coach but not OC.
Even if the system does not change you still can hire a great OC. When Cut took over for Sanders he ran the same offense but it was night and days BETTER under Cut. The great OCs are able to execute the offense on a different level and take the same players who sucked the year before and make them better. That is why DeBord has not been an OC for 7 years, he is not on the level of a Cutcliffe. DeBord ran CMU's program into the ground and I would be willing to bet he does the same thing with our offense. He would have been an OK choice for OL or TE coach but not OC.
Everyone here does realize that he is not coaching the O Line right? I keep seeing posts about how our run game will get better because he will coach up the OL to block better... He is the OC along with being the QB coach, a position he has not coached since like 1985 if Josh Wards tweets are correct. I'm pretty sure he wasn't the QB coach for ol Terrific Tom.
:clapping:I don't know why people keep bringing this up. All offenses, no matter what style, have the same concepts. You still zone block on runs, no matter if you're in the I formation or spread. DeBord installed a zone block protection scheme at Michigan that all spread offenses still use today. Why get another read option coordinator? So we can throw 70 screen passes and run from the spread at the 2 yd line? DeBord will be able to teach better blocking schemes that are designed for a running attack, which is what this entire system is centered around. The guy has been a successful offensive coach and knows everything about the offensive line. Don't forget he coached the Seahawks offensive line and guess what...they run a West Coast offense, which is actually more of what he ran at Michigan. As I said before, it does not matter whether you run an option, spread, one back, West Coast offense because all offenses have the same building blocks. DeBord is a smart offensive minded coach. He can learn our playbook in a week. Let's not forget too, Butch was under DeBord at CMU and I watched some film from them in 2002 or 2003 and they were pretty much running the same things we do now under Butch. They're familiar with each other and Butch is keeping this system. DeBord can only add to our offensive attack by being a better teacher than Bajakian. He will be able to coach up our offensive line and instill a better running game, which are two things we really need if you wanna championships.