1996 UT (Led by Peyton Manning) lost to a Memphis team that posted a 4-7 overall record. No one called for Phil's head... and that was year 4 for him....
1996 UT (Led by Peyton Manning) lost to a Memphis team that posted a 4-7 overall record. No one called for Phil's head... and that was year 4 for him....
are you kidding? i remember that, i was there, and i remember a lot of negative reaction after that game.
in fact, up to that point, while there were always rumblings about Fulmer, after that game, for many, it sealed the deal on whether or not they wanted him gone.
I think most reasonable fans acknowledge this isn't the right time to dump Butch especially with improving in the win column each year, but goofy Derek Mason and Vandy beating UT may be the death knell. Purely hypothetical thread.
Can you provide proof that no one called for his head? Because I was at UT at that time and I remember it differently.
I understand the attrition situation. I don't form my opinions in a vacuum. I've been here watching all year....against Appy State, Virginia Tech, Ohio, TAMU, Bama, USC, and UK. Teams have had success running on this team all year. Mizzou setting a school record for rushing on us is just the cherry on top.
Yes and the most points scored against this defense before the attrition started was 28 by Fla, and that was without maybin and Sutton. Starting at AM, we had a rotation of 4 solid DT's and when O'Brien was lost that rotation dropped to 3. Then, Tuttle, then McKenzie, in subsequent games and now every game we play we give up a ton of points. There is more to defense than rushing yardage alone. For instance, You can give up all you want between the 20's but if you can get turnovers and hold them to field goals you are playing sound defense. The atrocious defense did not start until we started losing our rotation of DT's.
It is in year 4 when we were picked to win the east. That's my opinion. You're entitled to yours, and welcome to cheer for average football just because we're better than we were under Dooley. However Dooley didn't give up nearly 700 yards on the ground against a 3 win East Rival. That is worse than mediocre, it's coaching malfeasance.
I've got a grip. Why can't people grasp that we want better for the program because we LOVE it too. I'm not being negative for the sake of being part of the NegaVol club. I see things about my alma mater, and it's football program that I'm concerned about.
It is in year 4 when we were picked to win the east. That's my opinion. You're entitled to yours, and welcome to cheer for average football just because we're better than we were under Dooley. However Dooley didn't give up nearly 700 yards on the ground against a 3 win East Rival. That is worse than mediocre, it's coaching malfeasance.
I've got a grip. Why can't people grasp that we want better for the program because we LOVE it too. I'm not being negative for the sake of being part of the NegaVol club. I see things about my alma mater, and it's football program that I'm concerned about.