Ditto, this is NOT the guy we want.
Debunked ... 2015 Clemson article
Without further ado, let me put some of these questions and fears to rest: Tony Elliott calls all plays for the Clemson offense. How do I know that? When the two were announced as co-coordinators, Dabo, Scott, and Elliott all said as much in very plain language. On Sunday, Dec. 7th, just days after making the announcement that Scott and Elliott would be co-coordinators, Dabo announced that Tony Elliott would be calling plays. A few days later, in a joint press conference, Elliott discussed how he plans on calling the plays and managing the game. Scott went on to joke that he proposed they divide the play calling duties so that he could call first and second downs and Elliott could call third and fourth downs, but ends by saying that, "We figured this [Tony calling plays] was probably the best way." Tony Elliott was announced as the play caller almost immediately by Dabo. Tony and Jeff have both, consistently, confirmed that Elliott is the one calling the plays. There has been nothing said by anyone directly associated with Clemson to the contrary, so we have every reason to believe that Tony Elliott is the one calling plays for the Clemson Tiger offense. If it's really that straight forward, why has there been so much confusion?
I never have worshipped at the Church of This Happened So... and I’m not tithing now. Elliott’s low on my list of preferences but I tune out “cain’t hire this guy...he’s a Bammer” and do the same with “we hired a coordinator and it didn’t work”. Until EVERY situation is exactly the same and can be scientifically proven, I’m agnostic.
Yep, Morris and Scott had the opportunity to learn from Dabo. But apparently did not.He's had the opportunity to learn and develop his own program philosophies from Dabo. Not a bad person to learn how things are to be ran. What to do and not to do. He's ready to step into a HC job just like every other HC who was given a chance. If it's Elliott, so be it. If its someone else, so be it. I'm just ready to give who ever it is the opportunity to lead and win.
When so was in the Army, I had NCO's telling me certain Soldiers weren't ready to be promoted. Most were E-5 Squad Leaders. It wasn't that the Soldiers weren't ready, the NCO's just felt they didn't deserve it because of pride. A realization that those Soldiers under them would now be their peer. They couldn't accept it. Kind of like having to accept another OC as HC. No OC is the same.
Stop thinking and research what kind of coach he is. What players think. You've seen his on the field results already. Find out the kind of man he is, then make an educated response as to if you think he's good enough.It's funny because people were hating on Pruitt because he was a coordinator when in fact Pruitt has a hands down better resume. Proven coach or a legitimate offensive mastermind is what we need and I don't think Elliot is either. I'm sure he's a good dude who can potentially be a successful coach but it's not what we need.
True that.We have had major dysfunction within our administration for years with too much booster influence and warring factions. Not all schools are like UT and Auburn in this regard. It's well known that Saban insisted that boosters, particularly Bryant, Jr. GTFO as a condition of taking the job. A similar separation of church and state needs to occur at UT if we are to have a prayer of changing things for the better.
You named two random ass OC’s and that’s suppose to mean Elliot is destined to suck? Maybe he does or maybe he doesn’t but the examples you gave about other coaches doesn’t do it for me. Sorry you typed that super long message and didn’t really get a point across.
You could have simply said, “ other assistants have sucked before” and that would have been the same point as typing the story you typed.
If Danny wants Elliot, I want Elliot. #indannyitrust
Because Elliot has a higher ceiling.
Not to mention OFFENSE is the name of the game.
That's a huge difference.
People need to stop with this stupidazz analogy. One has nothing to do with the other.
A lot of coaches didn't do so well on their 1st HC gig. Has nothing to do with any other coach like Morris and Scott's results have nothing to do with anyone else see.
Since reading comprehension isn’t one of your strengths, I’ll try to help you out. The key phrase in my post was “for a program trying to rebuild”. Smart and Jimbo didn’t take total rebuild jobs as coordinators getting SEC gigs. Mullen got a basement dweller program job at MSU. Those are totally different situations than UT. Our problems are way too big for an up and coming coordinator.
Doug Dickey was an assistant at Arkansas I think it was and it worked out pretty good
It's funny because people were hating on Pruitt because he was a coordinator when in fact Pruitt has a hands down better resume. Proven coach or a legitimate offensive mastermind is what we need and I don't think Elliot is either. I'm sure he's a good dude who can potentially be a successful coach but it's not what we need.
Again, people love to cherry-pick a guy here and a guy there who prove their point. If you list the men who were coordinators that didn't succeed as HC when they took over a Power 5, I'll almost guarantee that loser list is way way longer
You do realize Dabo was an OC and has been calling plays longer than Elliot right?