NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 17,125
- Likes
- 60,813
You mentioned the need for Boswell to attack the rim. I don’t disagree with you, but it’s interesting that there were times he was super aggressive. It was mainly early in the season. The Houston game comes to mind. He was attacking the rim at times when no one else would. Then it stopped.I never said there wasn't room for both. The % is very misleading as he doesn't shoot when wide open so it doesn't actually provide any spacing. He shot 32% from 3 in SEC play on 14 makes in 20 games. Evans had a learning curve coming from the OTE, but it began to click for him in the backhalf of conference play. Boswell was/is an effort defender and Evans can be just as good on that end while offering a practical offensive skillset that includes attacking the basket. Ideally, they are both back and platoon at the 3, but the point was that the staff does not just need to reach a certain quota of returning talent to hit that number and secondly, Amari Evans is the better overall investment for the program to make if it comes down to that imo
Regardless of getting some top catch and shoot threats in the portal, this team is going to have to have someone who can attack the rim. Boswell isn't doing that. Evans has shown he can and should take a big step forward with another year away from the twitch basketball league and with just naturally entering year two. Evans averaged more points, rebounds and steals in March than Boswell did. Shot it better too (Boswell shot 24% from the floor over the last eight games)
I think he has that ability. It’s a matter of nurturing and developing an aggressive mindset in him. He did look for the 3 more often in the NCAAT, so maybe it can be done. I’ve seen guys go from tentative to aggressive gradually throughout their careers. Josh Richardson comes to mind (not that Boswell is that kind of talent).
