Her 2022-23 Glenville team had 12 different girls with double digit minutes, and girl 13 had 8.5mpg. So probably 'no' to three full rotations, [though I'd be happy if she'd do it just for the 1st half, at least] but yes to deep roster usage. I'd probably be wise, for players outside your top 8, to sub in girls only if the upcoming possession is on the side of the ball (offense or defense) that they're strong in. They still have to play both sides obviously, but if you are strategic about when you sub them in and out, you can have them play 5 or so extra possessions per game on their good side than their bad side, perhaps?
For last year's team, looking at the analytics, that would have involved prioritizing subbing in Boyd and Darby to maximize their offensive possessions, and subbing in Puckett and Favor to maximize their defensive possessions, as all 4 of those players had notable splits in their offensive analytics vs defense analytics.
[This especially applies to Puckett; Tennessee in SEC play evidently averaged 85.1 per 100 on offense with her on the court, contrasted with us having 6 players who were over 100 per 100, and in NCAA Tournament play averaged merely 76.5 per 100 with Puckett on offense... really needed to play Favor and Strickland more, Puckett less]