HalfullVol
Ain't it Funky now - JB
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,240
- Likes
- 9,766
Indiana did an analysis of total snap count vs productivity. That’s their core metric. They aren’t on the hunt for “small”. They looked for high snap count because it suggests physical development and high productivity against snaps. Our vulnerability is youth. Garner is an A+ developer of talent and now we have a modern conditioning program, but none of that adds the physical growth of 18-22 or the yields that come with hundreds of snaps. We needed some more vets, but we definitely will get higher yields on youth than most teams would.
DT is going to be interesting this coming season... staff is putting a lot of faith in our existing position group to be much improved from this past season...Sounds like we won't be involved
Right outside 7-11.Thanks. Is that through the grapevine or have you seen a place where Indiana discusses it?
I am in favor of a hybrid Safety Defensive tackle body.Right outside 7-11.
Actually I made a long post before the portal season discussing how we/other teams have moved to advanced analytics for the portal. Teams that used these methods the last couple of years (Vandy/Indy) have incredible returns on spend. The big difference from past years, is the elimination of HS recruiting grades entirely. Indiana and Vandy used a blend of snap count and productivity against snap count only. I’m sure they look as speed, strength and other measurables, but the big development is dumping “potential” as a metric. LSU spent over 35mm in the portal and has an additional 20mm from profit sharing they spent this year. They chased big names, but did focus on snaps too. It will be interesting to see how it pans out next year. We have a very talented group, but they’re still a young team.
Ok, we can put aside our need for a DT or two, we got much bigger problems. We are in desperate need of another kind of fatboy. I hear that they did not sign a 3x male cheerleader this portal season and there isn't one on the roster. What the heck are we going to do with that XL cheerleading shirt that we give our fatboy? We gotta find someone to fill that jersey or we're screwed. This is unacceptable at TennesseeHe obviously reads VN and knows Yeti wisdom is damn near infallible. I am AP's source.
Same ones are the first to ask someone to share the info when AP posts an article.Some of you need to make a new thread titled AP! Y’all spend more time on him than the players.
I’d wager not a single one of you is a member of VQ so why do you care if someone else is? Don’t believe him, skip over the post.
Dee Tee?Tennessee and Josh Heupel have added 18 players through the transfer portal. And the Volunteers are not done adding to their roster ahead of the 2026 season, On3 has learned.
Miami transfer cornerback Jadais Richard is visiting Knoxville on Friday, sources tell On3. He made five appearances for the Hurricanes this past season, recording five tackles. In his three seasons with the Hurricanes, Richard made eight starts and amassed 46 tackles, three pass breakups and an interception.
The 6-foot-1, 195-pound cornerback is a former Vanderbilt transfer. He emerged as a starting cornerback for the Hurricanes in 2024, before suffering a season-ending injury late in the year. With Miami’s talented secondary in 2025, Richard played in five games.
Tennessee has added multiple pieces from the portal to its secondary, including Kansas State’s Qua Moss, Auburn’s Kayin Lee, Penn State’s Dejuan Lane, Michigan’s TJ Metcalf, Michigan’s Tevis Metcalf, Appalachian State’s DJ Burks and Colorado’s Isaiah Hardge
Richard played high school football at West Monroe (LA), where he was a four-star prospect. He was the No. 341 overall player and No. 36 cornerback in the 2022 recruiting cycle, according to the Rivals Industry Rankings.
- Nakos On3
Indiana did an analysis of total snap count vs productivity. That’s their core metric. They aren’t on the hunt for “small”. They looked for high snap count because it suggests physical development and high productivity against snaps. Our vulnerability is youth. Garner is an A+ developer of talent and now we have a modern conditioning program, but none of that adds the physical growth of 18-22 or the yields that come with hundreds of snaps. We needed some more vets, but we definitely will get higher yields on youth than most teams would.
Do you actually think that most of the idiots on this board can understand what you typed here? Phrases like "high productivity against snaps" and "higher yields on youth" are going to cause brain aneurisms to this group. @TrippieRedd got cross-eyed one sentence in and hid under a table. @Jackcrevol read "snap count vs. productivity" and started clapping like a baby seal, then licked the screen. @Weezer colored his screen with blue crayon. To be fair, he does that to every post.Indiana did an analysis of total snap count vs productivity. That’s their core metric. They aren’t on the hunt for “small”. They looked for high snap count because it suggests physical development and high productivity against snaps. Our vulnerability is youth. Garner is an A+ developer of talent and now we have a modern conditioning program, but none of that adds the physical growth of 18-22 or the yields that come with hundreds of snaps. We needed some more vets, but we definitely will get higher yields on youth than most teams would.
