2024 Presidential Race

#13,827
#13,827
GroverCleveland said:
Well, just to be clear as I may be misunderstanding you on these points:

Is it your contention that the daughter-in-law of someone who has now run for POTUS three times has zero experience in politics? Campaigns she has participated in and had a front-row seat to all the ugly of Presidential campaigns? Because your attack on me is about my assertion she does have experience with politics, not arguing she doesn't have enough for the position or something reasonable. Talk about saying something really dumb.

With regards to the statement about Germany and Merkel, it is obviously hyperbole and you inability to recognize it is about freaking stupid as you're claiming the statement was. And I do agree it was a dumbass statement. American politics is full of dumbass statements. They happen multiple times a minute when politicians are in front of a camera. The conservatives on here have been decrying the sorry state of affairs of our political environment. Those of you on the left are virtually rabid about Trump.

And for the record, I don't like Trump either. Never voted for him in a primary, but voted for him in the General (will do so again) because his policies are head and shoulders above anything posited by the other candidates. I think he's an ass and if he is re-elected, we're going to have a three-ring circus for the next four years that will at least be more entertaining than the piss-poor three ring circus we'll have watching Biden continue to degenerate before our very eyes.
Click to expand...
I'm contending that Lara Trump's "experience" is not a result of the quality of her own credentials .... but is instead, a result of blatant nepotism - which Republicans have occasionally been against?
 
#13,828
#13,828
McDad said:
Because it is normal and customary for politicians to make broad grandiose promises that rarely if ever come to reality??
Click to expand...
Everyone seems to forget to get anything requires legislation that will garner at least 60 votes in the Senate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#13,829
#13,829
BowlBrother85 said:
HRC is the one and only Democratic Party candidate that Trump could have ever beaten .... or will ever beat. He won in 2016 by default - and even then, she received close to 3 million more popular votes.
Click to expand...
Sore loser just like the stolen election 2020 Trumpers you are…mmmmm.
 
#13,830
#13,830
BowlBrother85 said:
HRC is the one and only Democratic Party candidate that Trump could have ever beaten .... or will ever beat. He won in 2016 by default - and even then, she received close to 3 million more popular votes.
Click to expand...
Are you predicting Biden beats Trump this year?
 
#13,833
#13,833
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes. Other than Georgia, I think the electoral map will look the same way it did in 2020.
Click to expand...
Then wtf is it with all the bitchin and moaning about Lara and RNC???

If your preference is going to win, what does it matter?

Same for @luthervol if he believes Biden defeats Trump?

Eta... wait a second, is part of it you wanna see Trump pay his fines and be personally punished???
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, KptVFL, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#13,834
#13,834
PEPPERJAX said:
Sore loser just like the stolen election 2020 Trumpers you are…mmmmm.
Click to expand...
No .... I have never said that HRC was cheated. She lost a free and fair election. There was nothing illegitimate about the 2020 Presidential General Election. Trump won it.

^^^^ That is a lot different ^^^^ ..... than anything that the 2020 election deniers will ever admit.
 
#13,836
#13,836
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm contending that Lara Trump's "experience" is not a result of the quality of her own credentials .... but is instead, a result of blatant nepotism - which Republicans have occasionally been against?
Click to expand...
The original post I responded to directly talked about Hunter Biden's role on the BOD of a Ukrainian gas company.

You "quote" experience. Spit out man, you think she has experience or not. Which is it? Then, in a real doozy, it seems to be your problem is that any experience she has is because of nepotism. Am I incorrect? I do not see how nepotism played a role in her gaining political experience because she is his daughter in law. What the hell was she supposed to do? Move to Antarctica to avoid political experience? Now, if your problem is she got the position with the RNC because of nepotism, hey, definitely can be debated. I won't argue it, I'm just saying the argument she has no experience is beyond dumb.

And in light of my initial post to which you responded involved Hunter's position on the Board, if you cannot admit you're way off base complaining about nepotism is proof positive of TDS.
 
#13,838
#13,838
luthervol said:
That is the epitome of a false equivalency. The desire to normalize trumpsim is beyond sad and ultimately extremely harmful.
Click to expand...
You also say the same things as the “trumpsters”
“trying to normalize wokeism is beyond sad and it’s extremely harmful “

Hurrah for blind tribal morons
 
#13,839
#13,839
McDad said:
Then wtf is it with all the bitchin and moaning about Lara and RNC???

If your preference is going to win, what does it matter?

Same for @luthervol if he believes Biden defeats Trump?

Eta... wait a second, is part of it you wanna see Trump pay his fines and be personally punished???
Click to expand...
It's the brazenness of the act.

You have nepotism on top of a conflict of interest. Trump used his political clout to get his daughter-in-law a position she is completely unqualified for ... and this was done for the self-serving purpose of steering RNC donations towards his personal legal expenses. It is the act of an autocrat. It's highly unethical. Republicans complain about the ethics of the Biden's - when they don't even have their own house in order.
 
#13,840
#13,840
BowlBrother85 said:
^^^^ Full fledged cult member ^^^^
Click to expand...
You're unhinged.

There are two options for the next POTUS. Neither are my choice. But, I'm a cult member if I vote for the one not currently running the country into the ground and whose policies I most closely align with?

If you say "yes," then you clearly need help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#13,841
#13,841
I am disappointed no one "got" my statement about Hunter not knowing his rear end from an oil/gas well.

Come on, there has to be enough of you southern farm boys out there to get that.
 
#13,844
#13,844
BowlBrother85 said:
It's the brazenness of the act.

You have nepotism on top of a conflict of interest. Trump used his political clout to get his daughter-in-law a position she is completely unqualified for ... and this was done for the self-serving purpose of steering RNC donations towards his personal legal expenses. It is the act of an autocrat. It's highly unethical. Republicans complain about the ethics of the Biden's - when they don't even have their own house in order.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#13,845
#13,845
BowlBrother85 said:
It's the brazenness of the act.

You have nepotism on top of a conflict of interest. Trump used his political clout to get his daughter-in-law a position she is completely unqualified for ... and this was done for the self-serving purpose of steering RNC donations towards his personal legal expenses. It is the act of an autocrat. It's highly unethical. Republicans complain about the ethics of the Biden's - when they don't even have their own house in order.
Click to expand...
Ok. Let's run with that.
Is steering funds to his legal expenses illegal? If so, will an R party member pursue legal recourse? If not, and not your party and you're not filing suit, why does it matter so much to you?

Has any D used party funds on legal expenses?

I literally do not know the answers to the Qs. There is no "gotcha" planned here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KptVFL
#13,846
#13,846
kiddiedoc said:
You're unhinged.

There are two options for the next POTUS. Neither are my choice. But, I'm a cult member if I vote for the one not currently running the country into the ground and whose policies I most closely align with?

If you say "yes," then you clearly need help.
Click to expand...
You have proven yourself a cult member because of your unconditional support and defense of Donald Trump. You also label anyone who is critical of him as being the person who is truly at fault ... rather than addressing the merits of the criticism itself.

I think you and the rest of your cult are the ones in need of help.
 
#13,848
#13,848
Alright. I'm out for a bit.

I'll not be interrupting the slap fight anymore.
 
#13,849
#13,849
McDad said:
Ok. Let's run with that.
Is steering funds to his legal expenses illegal? If so, will an R party member pursue legal recourse? If not, and not your party and you're not filing suit, why does it matter so much to you?

Has any D used party funds on legal expenses?

I literally do not know the answers to the Qs. There is no "gotcha" planned here.
Click to expand...
I have only referred to it as being unethical. I have already said why it matters. It's highly unethical ... and brazenly so. No person who would do this, has any business being the President of the United States or even being taken seriously as a candidate for that matter.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top