2020 Primaries

#4,003
#4,003
Franklin Pierce said:
Joe Biden Confuses Sister for Wife

'You switched on me'
Former vice president Joe Biden confused his wife for his sister while giving a speech after notching several Super Tuesday primary wins.

"By the way, this is my little sister Valerie," Biden said in Los Angeles, while gesturing to his wife, Dr. Jill Biden.

"And I'm Jill's husband," he continued, taking the hand of his sister. "You switched on me," he said after realizing his mistake.

Joe Biden Confuses Sister for Wife
Click to expand...

tumblr_m6jnywwohG1qcx6vso4_r1_250.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, PEPPERJAX, Rickyvol77 and 2 others
#4,004
#4,004
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, Franklin Pierce and BigOrangeD
#4,006
#4,006
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, LouderVol, Franklin Pierce and 1 other person
#4,007
#4,007
luthervol said:
Human nature.
The right claims they are all Hollywood elitist libtards, unless of course they happen to agree with them, and then it's worthy of posting 20 tweets a day from that person.
We all know it works both ways.
You guys have James Woods and Ted Nugget.
The left has pretty much everyone else.
Click to expand...
You guys?😄😂 I don't have them, don't care what their opinions are, conservative or liberal. I don't tweet, don't follow any of them on anything. Where as you and @Mick were both able to throw the Viagra away because tweets from Hollywood and commie Bernie does tge trick😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Sandman 423
#4,008
#4,008
carlos86 said:
No one hates Obama more than Bernie Sanders. And not that his path to the nomination is disappearing he's moving to kiss his butt. Bernie is one of the biggest fake, frauds, and phonies ever.
Click to expand...
Say what you want to about Bernie, but I don't think he's a fake or phony. He really believes all that crap. He's a leftist Ron Paul - been saying the same thing for decades, and then a time came along where what he was saying became fashionable.

Pocahontas is the phony- she's a figure much closer to the establishment than Bernie is but saw that going further left was becoming more fashionable within the party and tried to get into his lane on a lot of issues, particularly student debt cancellation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and tennvols77
#4,010
#4,010
0nelilreb said:
Just because something failed doesn’t mean it wasn’t done . You can’t change the facts , they allowed him to do something they wouldn’t allow others to do . They were asked before him to allow others to do what he did and the chair of the DNC refused saying the rules were there to make it fair for everyone . I’m guessing $65 billion makes things a little more fair for the one that has that much .
Click to expand...
$65M changes the game. Hell, Luther would vote for Trump for $65M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and luthervol
#4,012
#4,012
zeppelin128 said:
I normally try not to get personal on here, but these are people I have known for years that seemingly turned on me overnight when I joined Pete's campaign team. And then they piled on for months while I stuck to promoting Pete and his policies, never attacking their guy.
Let's just say it really changed my opinion of them after how they acted toward me.
Click to expand...
I lauded you for putting your time in to volunteer for a campaign. I didn't agree with Pete on policy. But I admired you for living true to your convictions. If your irl friends can't do that, this is a sad world to live in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs, tennvols77 and 3 others
#4,013
#4,013
There are Already Rumblings in Democrat Circles Questioning the Dramatic Joe Biden Resurgence

After a surprisingly strong Super Tuesday side glances begin to take place over DNC support of Biden.

As the Super Tuesday results rolled in throughout Tuesday night things were expected to turn out favorably for Joe Biden, however the level of success enjoyed by the former VP was more than remarkable — some are taking a curious look at the results.


It is not simply that there were some surprises – like a victory in texas that was expected to for Bernie Sanders — but the manner that Biden won, and the level of success he experienced. While polls are consistently inaccurate and relying on them is a fool’s game at times, they also can be cause for some questioning when they are shown to be flat-out wrong.

But let’s just start with the Lone Star result. In the days leading up to the vote all polls showed Bernie Sanders winning, with the ranges ahead of the margin of error. Depending on the poll Sanders was being projected with between a 5-10% cushion, yet by night’s end Biden came out on top by better than a 3% margin. That is more than a significant swing, it amounts to a gross error. It calls to mind Saturday’s result in South Carolina, where polls showed a Biden victory, but none showing more than a return in the high thirties percentile. Biden received nearly half of the votes in that primary.

In Massachusetts, it was another curious return. For months it was either being looked at as a win for the native candidate Elizabeth Warren, or Sanders. Biden was always within striking distance but his win last night was never predicted by any poll. More curious is Warren taking third despite the home-field advantage. Then things get really confounding with the exit poll returns.

In her home state Warren lost out to Biden with female voters by ten percentage points. This despite the supposedly liberal stronghold in the area that would back a female, not to mention Joe Biden’s tough history as a creepily hands-on social interactor. Another internal metric that does not add up — Warren also, as a former Ivy League professor, lost to Biden with college-aged voters, by five percent.

This is seriously raising eyebrows while causing furrowed brows at the same time. Matt Viser at the Washington Post also noticed something curious about the ‘Biden Wave’ that crashed the polls last night.

Joe Biden is mopping the floor in states that he never visited, where he opened zero field offices, and where he spent next to nothing on TV.
​

 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Tennesseefan2019
#4,014
#4,014
Franklin Pierce said:
There are Already Rumblings in Democrat Circles Questioning the Dramatic Joe Biden Resurgence

After a surprisingly strong Super Tuesday side glances begin to take place over DNC support of Biden.

As the Super Tuesday results rolled in throughout Tuesday night things were expected to turn out favorably for Joe Biden, however the level of success enjoyed by the former VP was more than remarkable — some are taking a curious look at the results.


It is not simply that there were some surprises – like a victory in texas that was expected to for Bernie Sanders — but the manner that Biden won, and the level of success he experienced. While polls are consistently inaccurate and relying on them is a fool’s game at times, they also can be cause for some questioning when they are shown to be flat-out wrong.

But let’s just start with the Lone Star result. In the days leading up to the vote all polls showed Bernie Sanders winning, with the ranges ahead of the margin of error. Depending on the poll Sanders was being projected with between a 5-10% cushion, yet by night’s end Biden came out on top by better than a 3% margin. That is more than a significant swing, it amounts to a gross error. It calls to mind Saturday’s result in South Carolina, where polls showed a Biden victory, but none showing more than a return in the high thirties percentile. Biden received nearly half of the votes in that primary.

In Massachusetts, it was another curious return. For months it was either being looked at as a win for the native candidate Elizabeth Warren, or Sanders. Biden was always within striking distance but his win last night was never predicted by any poll. More curious is Warren taking third despite the home-field advantage. Then things get really confounding with the exit poll returns.

In her home state Warren lost out to Biden with female voters by ten percentage points. This despite the supposedly liberal stronghold in the area that would back a female, not to mention Joe Biden’s tough history as a creepily hands-on social interactor. Another internal metric that does not add up — Warren also, as a former Ivy League professor, lost to Biden with college-aged voters, by five percent.

This is seriously raising eyebrows while causing furrowed brows at the same time. Matt Viser at the Washington Post also noticed something curious about the ‘Biden Wave’ that crashed the polls last night.

Joe Biden is mopping the floor in states that he never visited, where he opened zero field offices, and where he spent next to nothing on TV.
​

Click to expand...
Nice hit piece by the fair and balanced website Red State. Biden cleaned up bc he has huge name recognition and the majority of the left aren’t sold on Bernie, his policies, or his half ass every 4 year claim that he’s a Democrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33, McDad and zeppelin128
#4,015
#4,015
zeppelin128 said:
I normally try not to get personal on here, but these are people I have known for years that seemingly turned on me overnight when I joined Pete's campaign team. And then they piled on for months while I stuck to promoting Pete and his policies, never attacking their guy.
Let's just say it really changed my opinion of them after how they acted toward me.
Click to expand...
I am in the barely tolerated trash category as a never Trumper. I am there supposedly to offer a different view point but really I am there to be trashed whenever they remember I still exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33 and McDad
#4,017
#4,017
Franklin Pierce said:
DNC says debate 'threshold will go up' after Gabbard clears previous mark

The Democrats running for president will meet for their 11th debate later this month, but a new promise of higher qualification requirements could exclude one candidate who would have made the cut under previous rules.

DNC says debate 'threshold will go up' after Gabbard clears previous mark
Click to expand...
No they arent fixing the election at all. Absolutely no interference what so ever. Sucks when you cant buy a favorable change from the DNC.
 
#4,018
#4,018
hUTch2002 said:
$65M changes the game. Hell, Luther would vote for Trump for $65M.
Click to expand...

For $65 million , I’ll campaign for and write in Putin’s name . You peasants can call me whatever you want to after that. I’ll just buy your affections with season football tickets and vacations on our new yacht . 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002, AM64, joevol33 and 3 others
#4,019
#4,019
LouderVol said:
I am in the barely tolerated trash category as a never Trumper. I am there supposedly to offer a different view point but really I am there to be trashed whenever they remember I still exist.
Click to expand...
I’m an independent that trump has definitely won over..... zep could have supported a republican candidate and be called racist, misogynist, and whatever other new term they come up with on a daily basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,020
#4,020
Franklin Pierce said:
There are Already Rumblings in Democrat Circles Questioning the Dramatic Joe Biden Resurgence

After a surprisingly strong Super Tuesday side glances begin to take place over DNC support of Biden.

As the Super Tuesday results rolled in throughout Tuesday night things were expected to turn out favorably for Joe Biden, however the level of success enjoyed by the former VP was more than remarkable — some are taking a curious look at the results.


It is not simply that there were some surprises – like a victory in texas that was expected to for Bernie Sanders — but the manner that Biden won, and the level of success he experienced. While polls are consistently inaccurate and relying on them is a fool’s game at times, they also can be cause for some questioning when they are shown to be flat-out wrong.

But let’s just start with the Lone Star result. In the days leading up to the vote all polls showed Bernie Sanders winning, with the ranges ahead of the margin of error. Depending on the poll Sanders was being projected with between a 5-10% cushion, yet by night’s end Biden came out on top by better than a 3% margin. That is more than a significant swing, it amounts to a gross error. It calls to mind Saturday’s result in South Carolina, where polls showed a Biden victory, but none showing more than a return in the high thirties percentile. Biden received nearly half of the votes in that primary.

In Massachusetts, it was another curious return. For months it was either being looked at as a win for the native candidate Elizabeth Warren, or Sanders. Biden was always within striking distance but his win last night was never predicted by any poll. More curious is Warren taking third despite the home-field advantage. Then things get really confounding with the exit poll returns.

In her home state Warren lost out to Biden with female voters by ten percentage points. This despite the supposedly liberal stronghold in the area that would back a female, not to mention Joe Biden’s tough history as a creepily hands-on social interactor. Another internal metric that does not add up — Warren also, as a former Ivy League professor, lost to Biden with college-aged voters, by five percent.

This is seriously raising eyebrows while causing furrowed brows at the same time. Matt Viser at the Washington Post also noticed something curious about the ‘Biden Wave’ that crashed the polls last night.
​
Joe Biden is mopping the floor in states that he never visited, where he opened zero field offices, and where he spent next to nothing on TV.​
​

Click to expand...
Yea this is a hit piece. Both Bloomberg and Sanders’s camp both privately said that Joe Biden was making group on them. Particularly the Sanders Campaign said that they would do a poll that showed Sanders in the lead and every poll after that showed Biden gaining or taking the lead. Also Amy Klobuchar and Buttigieg basically turned their ground game into pro Biden ground game in less than 24 hours and they pushed voter turnout for Biden.
 
#4,021
#4,021
carlos86 said:
Click to expand...
I will be the first to admit that I didn't see it coming. I guess Bernie scared the sh!t out of the Dem establishment, so they pulled out all the stops. I am actually surprised that they hate Trump so much that they would put all of their eggs in the basket of a man who is obviously suffering some form of mental decline. I see the 25th Amendment in his future if he makes it into office. Of course, there is still a long way to go before he is the nominee. I never thought he would be, and still have trouble believing it could actually happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,022
#4,022
Mick said:
The fix is in? Do you have proof votes were altered? You must be one of those butt hurt Trump supporters throwing your support to Bernie. You probably "predicted" Bernie would be the nominee .. Just what did you predict anyway?
Click to expand...

Didn't the Russians fix the last election without altering votes? There are lots of way to fix an election. Dims have routinely "found" boxes of votes stashed away in case of emergency.
 
#4,023
#4,023
1972 Grad said:
I will be the first to admit that I didn't see it coming. I guess Bernie scared the sh!t out of the Dem establishment, so they pulled out all the stops. I am actually surprised that they hate Trump so much that they would put all of their eggs in the basket of a man who is obviously suffering some form of mental decline. I see the 25th Amendment in his future if he makes it into office. Of course, there is still a long way to go before he is the nominee. I never thought he would be, and still have trouble believing it could actually happen.
Click to expand...
Their choice was a Marxist who’s advisers are Marxists or the established well like politician who maybe old but is surrounded by competent advisers who practical and realist.
 
#4,025
#4,025
bnhunt said:
That still doesn't explain reducing polling places in those areas.
Click to expand...

There literally are or have been four polling places within a couple of miles of my house, and I'm in a not so compact suburban environment. All four locations were active at one time, in fact. One or two of those have closed (a school and a church) after another church expanded and has much more room. Everybody has a chance to vote, there are more workers in one place, the flow rate is better, doesn't conflict with school operation, and no one except perhaps the people living next door to the church no longer used is really disadvantaged. However, for the record, a couple of polling places were closed, and no new ones opened. See how that works without even implying that minorities were disadvantaged. And this is one of the fastest growth areas ... a reason I'm leaving. So you could say the population is increasing, and polling places were closed ... sound and fury signifying nothing, if you wish.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top