pharmDvol11
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2011
- Messages
- 4,114
- Likes
- 3,583
Clemson's last 7 classes were rated 15, 16, 9, 11, 16, 7 and 10. They've averaged outside the top 10 and won two NC's with those players. What they do well is evaluate players (note I didn't say "talent") better than the recruiting services. We don't know if Pruitt is doing that well or not. Hopeful that he is and we'll be competing with Bama in a couple more years.
Sorry but Clemson plays in an absolute joke of a conference in the ACC. They don't play a meat-grinder schedule the way teams in the SEC do. Sure, they can put it all together for a championship game, but if they had to play the likes of Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Auburn, Florida, Texas A&M, etc week in and week out, you bet your ass they wouldn't be running the table the way they do in the ACC.
They beat the crap out of Alabama in the NC game. I mean embarrassed them, and made them look like, by your standards, an ACC team. What more do you want Clemson to prove? Alabama ran the table in the SEC and looked totally unstoppable... before running into Clemson.
The SEC is a tough conference. Nobody denies that. I just fail to see the logic in speculating about whether Clemson would run the table in the SEC after they obliterated the team that actually did.
Agreed.Like I said, it's one thing to put it all together for one game. It's quite another to have to play a meat grinder of a schedule in the SEC the way we do. Utah beat the crap out of Alabama too a few years back in the Sugar Bowl. You think they would've lasted playing an SEC schedule? No way. All I'm saying is Clemson has an easier road to the playoffs than we do, which is why they can get away with those recruiting classes. To have a REAL chance to compete for the SEC title, we need at the very least to average a top 10 class year in and year out and crack the top 5 every so often.
Which diet you guys thinking Pruitt puts him on? Keto? Paleo? Whole30? Butch’s PB n J?
Like I said, it's one thing to put it all together for one game. It's quite another to have to play a meat grinder of a schedule in the SEC the way we do. Utah beat the crap out of Alabama too a few years back in the Sugar Bowl. You think they would've lasted playing an SEC schedule? No way. All I'm saying is Clemson has an easier road to the playoffs than we do, which is why they can get away with those recruiting classes. To have a REAL chance to compete for the SEC title, we need at the very least to average a top 10 class year in and year out and crack the top 5 every so often.
Hopefully, a heart-friendly diet combined with a good strength and conditioning regime. That way if he maintains it in the future he'd be less likely to die of heart failure. Or become a diabetic and barely mobile pile of blubber like William Perry. Ignoring his weight or crashing diving diets just to meet a football agenda devoid of a truly healthy lifestyle agenda says our program doesn't care about the person beyond football. But if we do it right and he elects to depart from it, it says he doesn't care about himself.
They beat the crap out of Alabama in the NC game. I mean embarrassed them, and made them look like, by your standards, an ACC team. What more do you want Clemson to prove? Alabama ran the table in the SEC and looked totally unstoppable... before running into Clemson.
The SEC is a tough conference. Nobody denies that. I just fail to see the logic in speculating about whether Clemson would run the table in the SEC after they obliterated the team that actually did.
They beat the crap out of Alabama in the NC game. I mean embarrassed them, and made them look like, by your standards, an ACC team. What more do you want Clemson to prove? Alabama ran the table in the SEC and looked totally unstoppable... before running into Clemson.
The SEC is a tough conference. Nobody denies that. I just fail to see the logic in speculating about whether Clemson would run the table in the SEC after they obliterated the team that actually did.