2018 Schedule - I dare

#302
#302
woodsmanvol said:
sept. 1 vs. West virginia (charlotte, n.c.)

w 16 -10 defense shines early, offense not so much.

sept. 8 etsu

w 48 - 12 defense shows up again, weak etsu
defense makes ut offense look good.

sept. 15 utep

w 38 - 22 pruitt put subs in too soon.

sept. 22 florida

w 19 - 10 pride on both struggling teams.

sept. 29 at georgia

l 38 - 16 defense on the field too often.

oct. 13 at auburn

l 28 -14 offense continues to lag behind defense
development.

oct. 20 alabama

w 19 -10 a shocking event. Offensive line begins to assert itself. Backs and receivers show up in the 4th quarter.

oct. 27 at south carolina

w 46-26 offense primed and confident. Pruitt inserts subs again too soon.

nov. 3 charlotte

w 49 - 10 subs play a significant amount of time.

nov. 10 kentucky

w 50 - 10 order of universe returns to form. But for three quarters wildcats make it a game. Pruitt doesn’t sub this time.

nov. 17 missouri

w 54 - 26 dooley hate is strong. Pruitt understands this and lets the beasts loose.

nov. 24 at vanderbilt

w 30 - 20 revenge game, lots of penalties, lots of highlight plays. This is going to be a heck of a game fueled by pride, intra-state hatred, and lots of vols fury. There will be bigger names in games in 2018 but this one has highlight championship all over it.
Click to expand...
6 and 6 and move on to 2019'
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#303
#303
Iam4utalways said:
Your stats are bad. Even UTsports,com has wrong stats when it comes to our SEC record. Just figure it out. Don't be mad at me if you can't figure out your mistake or even if you can.

I've been to too many games at rival stadiums over the last few years to believe your assessment of how the Vols are viewed by other SEC teams and their fans. The joy they have after a win over the Vols tell me more than you can. I've been to enough scrub games to be able to tell the difference in the atmospheres. A win over the Vols is a feather in the cap of our rivals, even when we are at our worst.
Click to expand...

You are pointing out that my stats are bad but cant tell me how? Translation : i dont want to believe those.

And i didnt get the stats from ut sports. Just curious, how are their stats bad, other than then being accurate reflecting the team has been bad?

You say youve been to many opposing teams stadiums ans watched us lose and it made other fans feel good. Lol, fans usually feel good when their team wins...and for the upper eceholon of the sec...the beat tennessee ....often, glad they feel good about. They view us like we used to vjew vandy. Im sure the scrubs are still very happy to beat us often. That makes me feel better too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#304
#304
volfannbama said:
You are pointing out that my stats are bad but cant tell me how? Translation : i dont want to believe those.

And i didnt get the stats from ut sports. Just curious, how are their stats bad, other than then being accurate reflecting the team has been bad?

You say youve been to many opposing teams stadiums ans watched us lose and it made other fans feel good. Lol, fans usually feel good when their team wins...and for the upper eceholon of the sec...the beat tennessee ....often, glad they feel good about. They view us like we used to vjew vandy. Im sure the scrubs are still very happy to beat us often. That makes me feel better too.
Click to expand...

It's not that I don't want to believe your #s or can't tell you how they are wrong. I don't believe them because they are wrong. Let me know when you give up on correcting them on your own and want my help to get the #s right.

The reason I mentioned UTsport.com's #s so you wouldn't feel silly for posting inaccurate #s about the Vols since they have made a similar mistake.

There is a different atmosphere at games vs scrubs and games vs teams with tradition.
 
#305
#305
Iam4utalways said:
It's not that I don't want to believe your #s or can't tell you how they are wrong. I don't believe them because they are wrong. Let me know when you give up on correcting them on your own and want my help to get the #s right.

The reason I mentioned UTsport.com's #s so you wouldn't feel silly for posting inaccurate #s about the Vols since they have made a similar mistake.

There is a different atmosphere at games vs scrubs and games vs teams with tradition.
Click to expand...

My numbers are not accurate but you cant point out the inaccuracy? Nice.

Tennesses record agaisnt the sec is awful, but its comforting to know the atmosphere is different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#306
#306
volfannbama said:
My numbers are not accurate but you cant point out the inaccuracy? Nice.

Tennesses record agaisnt the sec is awful, but its comforting to know the atmosphere is different.
Click to expand...

Your #s are wrong. When you realize they are wrong just fix them. If you can't figure it out and want me to give you a hint, let me know and I will. Just don't be bitter about it.

You are the one worried about our rival fan's perspective.

I'm just trying to talk trash to all the fans of all the scub teams on our schedule going into detail of how they are inferior and that I consider them to be gimme games.

I expect our players and coaches to working like heck to back up my trash talk.

You don't stop talking trash because of wins/losses. If you have matured with age, and don't trash talk because you're sophisticated and don't engage in such, so be it.
 
#307
#307
XgmkOoj.gif
 
#308
#308
Iam4utalways said:
Your #s are wrong. When you realize they are wrong just fix them. If you can't figure it out and want me to give you a hint, let me know and I will. Just don't be bitter about it.

You are the one worried about our rival fan's perspective.

I'm just trying to talk trash to all the fans of all the scub teams on our schedule going into detail of how they are inferior and that I consider them to be gimme games.

I expect our players and coaches to working like heck to back up my trash talk.

You don't stop talking trash because of wins/losses. If you have matured with age, and don't trash talk because you're sophisticated and don't engage in such, so be it.
Click to expand...

Sure give me a hint as to why the numbers are wrong? Please explain how we didnt actually lose the games we have lost?
 
#310
#310
Iam4utalways said:
29+56=85

NCAA violations resulting in wins being forfeited. I can only remember a tie that happening to no losses.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about ncaa violations and forfeited ? You listed teams you considered gimme and toss ups for the sec. I gave you are win loss record against those teams.
 
#311
#311
volfannbama said:
What are you talking about ncaa violations and forfeited ? You listed teams you considered gimme and toss ups for the sec. I gave you are win loss record against those teams.
Click to expand...

Total sec 10 years = 29-56

Your #s are wrong. What are the right #s?

You are the one that asked how losses could be changed to wins. I was answering your random question.
 
#313
#313
SC 4-6
FL 1-9
AL 0-10
GA 3-7
Vandy 6-4
KY 8-2
MO 2-4
LSU 0-3
Ole Miss 1-2
Auburn 0-3
Miss State 1-1
arky 0-2
A&M 0-1

26-54 is the SEC record I found for the last 10 years.

Who's a chump, gump, whatever....I don't know.

However, I'm not sure I'd be doing any name calling with a record like that.
 
#314
#314
volfannbama said:
And how are my numbers wrong? What are the correct numbers?
Click to expand...

Total sec 10 years = 29-56

I'm not sure which one is wrong.

We play 8 SEC games a year.

8x10=80

29+56=85

Honestly I don't know which one is wrong. I have no idea what the right one is. I was counting on you to fix it.

What 10 years were you looking at?

Are you counting OOC games as SEC games?

Are the wins wrong?

Are the losses wrong?
 
#315
#315
99gator said:
SC 4-6
FL 1-9
AL 0-10
GA 3-7
Vandy 6-4
KY 8-2
MO 2-4
LSU 0-3
Ole Miss 1-2
Auburn 0-3
Miss State 1-1
arky 0-2
A&M 0-1

26-54 is the SEC record I found for the last 10 years.

Who's a chump, gump, whatever....I don't know.

However, I'm not sure I'd be doing any name calling with a record like that.
Click to expand...

Are you the kind that only talks trash after a win? Poor form.

Trash talking is for before the game and during the game until it's decided. Once it's decided or over, trash talk is for sore losers and poor winners.

It's on the team to back up my trash talk. I trust them to have my back.

Edit: The gumps(They like being called gumps.) just beat the chumps for the NC.
 
Last edited:
#316
#316
Iam4utalways said:
Are you the kind that only talks trash after a win? Poor form.

Trash talking is for before the game and during the game until it's decided. Once it's decided or over, trash talk is for sore losers and poor winners.

It's on the team to back up my trash talk. I trust them to have my back.

Edit: The gumps(They like being called gumps.) just beat the chumps for the NC.
Click to expand...


Okay cool, you got me. Great job. I went back to 07 on non annual teams and 08 on annual
So here you go:

Your gimmes:
Ky 9-2, usc 5-6, mizz 2-4, vandy 7-4, msu- 2-1, ol miss - 1-2, Ark 1-2...


27-21 overall on gimme games.
Lol.....we have losing records to 4..lol over half

Your toss ups:
Fla 1-10, ala 0-11, lsu 0-4, aub 0-3, uga 4-7, tam 0-1

5-36.

5 games in 11 seasons. Lol
Against teams you call toss ups we have a winning record agaisnt none, we are winless against 4 of the 6

32-57 against so calles gimmies and toss ups.

In reality it appears the gimmes are more of a toss up and the toss ups view us as a gimme, with good reason, with the only possible exceptions of uk and uga.

Lol, carry on with the stupidity
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#317
#317
volfannbama said:
Okay cool, you got me. Great job. I went back to 07 on non annual teams and 08 on annual
So here you go:

Your gimmes:
Ky 9-2, usc 5-6, mizz 2-4, vandy 7-4, msu- 2-1, ol miss - 1-2, Ark 1-2...


27-21 overall on gimme games.
Lol.....we have losing records to 4..lol over half

Your toss ups:
Fla 1-10, ala 0-11, lsu 0-4, aub 0-3, uga 4-7, tam 0-1

5-36.

5 games in 11 seasons. Lol
Against teams you call toss ups we have a winning record agaisnt none, we are winless against 4 of the 6

32-57 against so calles gimmies and toss ups.

In reality it appears the gimmes are more of a toss up and the toss ups view us as a gimme, with good reason, with the only possible exceptions of uk and uga.

Lol, carry on with the stupidity
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you don't want to hear your new #s are wrong. That's beside the point.

The point. Over the time period you selected we have fired 3 coaches for losing gimme games and so many toss ups.
 
#318
#318
All I'm getting from this back and forth is one guy saying we have sucked and another guy vehemently arguing that we have sucked slightly less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#319
#319
Doyle Hargraves said:
All I'm getting from this back and forth is one guy saying we have sucked and another guy vehemently arguing that we have sucked slightly less.
Click to expand...

I've misrepresented myself. We have been bad, very bad. We've been going thru coaches left and right. When I started paying attention to college football our coach was Johnny Majors, so I'm not used to what's been going on these past few years.

Just because we have gotten worse doesn't mean I've gained respect for our competition. We keep firing coaches for losing gimme games and too many toss ups.

He posted bad #s and he has done it again.

If you are going to go out if your way to say how bad we have done and use #s to support your opinion, get the #s right for once. Twice in this case.
 
Last edited:
#320
#320
Iam4utalways said:
I'm guessing you don't want to hear your new #s are wrong. That's beside the point.

The point. Over the time period you selected we have fired 3 coaches for losing gimme games and so many toss ups.
Click to expand...

Thats cause they are not...and the point is because of the coaching changes we are no longer a good team and cant consider anyone a gimme. The fact is we are much more aligned with the bottom half of the SEC
 
#321
#321
Iam4utalways said:
I've misrepresented myself. We have been bad, very bad. We've been going thru coaches left and right. When I started paying attention to college football our coach was Johnny Majors, so I'm not used to what's been going on these past few years.

Just because we have gotten worse doesn't mean I've gained respect for our competition. We keep firing coaches for losing gimme games and too many toss ups.

He posted bad #s and he has done it again.

If you are going to go out if your way to say how bad we have done and use #s to support your opinion, get the #s right for once. Twice in this case.
Click to expand...

Then just skip the bs and show how the numbers are wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#323
#323
Iam4utalways said:
They don't add up again 32-57.

That's only 89 games. From the what you picked out to look at it should add up to 90.
Click to expand...

The recordes for each team is there for you to review.

Appears you wil need to change your definition for a gimme and a toss up,

As it appears we win what you call your gimme games just over 50 of the time making them the true defintion of a toss up.
And we win what you call a toss up less than 10 % of the time.
 
#325
#325
Unlike so many, I'm not ready to lower my expectations for our players and our coaching staff.

Us having a few bad years is the only reason for out record being so bad. The only exception I would make would be SC when Spurrier was there. He improved their program when Holtz could not. Spurrier gained my respect by making them something from nothing, until he quit mid season due to the thought of losing to Tn coached by Butch. The rest of the scrub teams have had little to do with our losses other than they were on our schedule. The others are just not much better. They have improve some but not enough to be consider toss ups by me.

I can't say with a straight face that Vandy is a good team that deserves respect. Same goes for Ky, Mo and SC(Now that Spurrier is gone.).
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top