luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 47,510
- Likes
- 20,353
I wish the R's would just go ahead and end all public assistance. The blowback would be swift and decisive.1. We are already into people's personal possessions. That's not going to change.
2. People were afforded the opportunity to accumulate those personal possessions because of the affluence of the society in which they exist. That comes at a cost.
The debate on how the burden should be dispersed will be unending. To me, the trends in wealth redistribution and tax laws are both going in the wrong direction. That's just me, and luckily I and my family will personally be just fine either way.
1. We are already into people's personal possessions. That's not going to change.
2. People were afforded the opportunity to accumulate those personal possessions because of the affluence of the society in which they exist. That comes at a cost.
The debate on how the burden should be dispersed will be unending. To me, the trends in wealth redistribution and tax laws are both going in the wrong direction. That's just me, and luckily I and my family will personally be just fine either way.
WRT #1. Trump jas lessened the burden with the tax cuts. Significant in my case thank you very much. WRT #2, that is Obama's "You didn't build that" repackaged. More retardation.1. We are already into people's personal possessions. That's not going to change.
2. People were afforded the opportunity to accumulate those personal possessions because of the affluence of the society in which they exist. That comes at a cost.
The debate on how the burden should be dispersed will be unending. To me, the trends in wealth redistribution and tax laws are both going in the wrong direction. That's just me, and luckily I and my family will personally be just fine either way.
lol..........You lost the right to say, "that's the way it is so that's the way it should be" when you said that there electoral college needs to be changed. It's a lazy form of debate anyway. If you can't support your ideals, i understand. I expected it.
Just know that every time you refer to "fair share" around here, everyone will remember your failures here.
And you have yet to define 'fair share' as anything other than 'more'.lol..........
You are fascinating at creating your own reality.
I never said the electoral college needs to be changed. You ASSUMED that and made it your reality.
"Fair share" has always been and will always be open to personal definition and interpretation.
I think an individual's interpretation is one of the best self-definers of that individual.
Nice try. You're pitiful.lol..........
You are fascinating at creating your own reality.
I never said the electoral college needs to be changed. You ASSUMED that and made it your reality.
"Fair share" has always been and will always be open to personal definition and interpretation.
I think an individual's interpretation is one of the best self-definers of that individual.
That is why they won't do it. They talk a big game but they can't afford to lose the votes in the Red States. You people know this is true.