2018 Midterm Election Thread

Regardless of whether that's true, it still doesn't change their message.
Sure it does. I don't trust stats or graphs from the American Nazi Party either. The character flaw is too profound when someone has devout, vocal and malignant racism. Perhaps were she a reformed racist it would be different.

You're welcome to use it as a source but the editorial board's musing are of no value to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
Sure it does. I don't trust stats or graphs from the American Nazi Party either. The character flaw is too profound when someone has devout, vocal and malignant racism. Perhaps were she a reformed racist it would be different.

You're welcome to use it as a source but the editorial board's musing are of no value to me.
The message is that few Republicans in the midterms are using the tax cuts as a plus and to tout it as an accomplishment. It has nothing to do with the NYT.
I'm sure this CBS article saying the same thing won't sway you either.

Instead of tax cuts, GOP candidates motivate with anxiety
 
Last edited:
Regardless of whether that's true, it still doesn't change their message.

They’re not supposed to have a message when reporting the news. Those are called oped pieces. When reporting the news they’re supposed to... you know... just report the news.

I’ll append though in this case it opened with “in opinion”. That isn’t news.
 
The message is that few Republicans in the midterms are using the tax cuts as a plus and to tout it as an accomplishment. It has nothing to do with the NYT.
I'm sure this CBS article saying the same thing won't sway you either.

Instead of tax cuts, GOP candidates motivate with anxiety
I can't trust their message. Just as I couldnt trust the message of BBC America if they employed a skinhead in an upper echelon position.

Some things are so heinous by the messenger it destroys the message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
I can't trust their message. Just as I couldnt trust the message of BBC America if they employed a skinhead in an upper echelon position.

Some things are so heinous by the messenger it destroys the message.
It's factual that most Republicans are struggling to make tax cuts a winning election issue. That isn't opinion.
 
It's factual that most Republicans are struggling to make tax cuts a winning election issue. That isn't opinion.

With such hard-hitting issues like straw bans, open borders and socialism, I can see how policies geared toward American workers would struggle to compete......
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
It's factual that most Republicans are struggling to make tax cuts a winning election issue. That isn't opinion.
Brother, it is the editorial section. Therefore, by definition, it is opinion. The graph or stats may be factually based but the editorial on those [facts] is opinion.

Again, if you wanna reference NYT's editorials with open, malicious racists on staff you have the wherewithal to do so. But referencing that source is hot garbage to me.
 
It's factual that most Republicans are struggling to make tax cuts a winning election issue. That isn't opinion.
I think it’s great the NYT knows better than AAPL and other companies how they should be using their cash. It’s why NYT is worth half what it was in 2000 and AAPL is up 5600%.
 
Reports are Ocasio Cortez may consider Shapiro's offer to debate him for $10,000 if he doubles it to $15,000.

FlashyEachAngora-size_restricted.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed

VN Store



Back
Top