hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 122,092
- Likes
- 181,267
Weak? HRC's lies have potential to have killed Americans in the field. They are not even close.Weak argument.
A liar is a liar be they be a R or a D.
Both Hillary and the Canadian are liars. Both are scum.
I have zero confidence that we will replace them with better people. I have 100% confidence that if we keep electing the same azzes that we keep electing, that nothing will change. In this case, a 0% confidence is the chance worth taking.It's a fair question.
Weak? HRC's lies have potential to have killed Americans in the field. They are not even close.
Look I know you hate Cruz, and that's fine, but to compare the two is extremely disingenuous.
I don't know how else I can say it. Hillary is probably responsible for Americans dying due to gross incompetence and blatant negligence. It is an apples and bowling balls comparison.A liar is a liar period.
If you disqualify Hillary because she lies, Cruz must also be disqualified.
Hillary has been in a position of power that could have potential to have Americans killed in the field, Cruz has not.
Cruz has shown what a lair he is during the last 2 debates.
If you want to support a liar don't try to justify his lying because his opponent lies. Two wrongs does not make a right.
I don't know how else I can say it. Hillary is probably responsible for Americans dying due to gross incompetence and blatant negligence. It is an apples and bowling balls comparison.
chicken**** answer. Vote for Rand. Vote for Mickey Mouse. I couldn't care less, but you are bashing an argument that you have no interest in shaping. Trolling, plain and simple.No thanks. I'll choice to think for myself and now allow fox to pick my candidate
