2016 Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Given the fact that the field is so fractured, and there appears to be so much antipathy within the GOP across these candidate lines, what makes you think that the GOP nominee this time is going to particularly motivate the GOP to turn out?

They may unify behind anti-Clinton, but they won't be voting FOR their own guy, as much as voting AGAINST her. It might be enough to win, but fact is the GOP is really lacking anyone with that rare combination of credentials and charisma.

That's where the Democrats have the advantage in national elections, they will line up a walk lockstep over that cliff for the party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Given the fact that the field is so fractured, and there appears to be so much antipathy within the GOP across these candidate lines, what makes you think that the GOP nominee this time is going to particularly motivate the GOP to turn out?

They may unify behind anti-Clinton, but they won't be voting FOR their own guy, as much as voting AGAINST her. It might be enough to win, but fact is the GOP is really lacking anyone with that rare combination of credentials and charisma.

I'm honestly not sure. Regardless of Trump wins or loses, he may have fractured the party. Rubio (one of the 5-7 most conservative senators) has been painted as an establishment RINO by this crowd solely because of his immigration stance.

They have to nominate someone who can potentially bridge the gap between the far right and moderates - that's why I think it has to be Rubio or Christie (not so much for his policies, but his bravado and temperament). Neither are a transformative politician like Obama, Reagan, or even Bill, but Hillary is so widely disliked that they can pull it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm honestly not sure. Regardless of Trump wins or loses, he may have fractured the party. Rubio (one of the 5-7 most conservative senators) has been painted as an establishment RINO by this crowd solely because of his immigration stance.

They have to nominate someone who can potentially bridge the gap between the far right and moderates - that's why I think it has to be Rubio or Christie (not so much for his policies, but his bravado and temperament). Neither are a transformative politician like Obama, Reagan, or even Bill, but Hillary is so widely disliked that they can pull it off.
Hillary is not disliked... by her retarded base. That is painfully obvious. She is a serious threat, and if the Rs don't unite behind whoever, she will be POTUS. God help us all.
 
For the next debate scheduled for Jan 16th, I'd prefer to only see the following candidates on stage:

Trump
Cruz
Rubio
Paul
Christie
Carson

And the only reason I include Carson is his poll numbers. I like him honestly, but the more he's on stage, the further he will drop. And the more likely his followers transfer to a candidate I feel is better suited for the job.

Limited to six candidates and have a real substance debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Hillary is not disliked... by her retarded base. That is painfully obvious. She is a serious threat, and if the Rs don't unite behind whoever, she will be POTUS. God help us all.

The Democrat base isn't large enough for that to be the tipping point... yet. I believe Bernie is much more popular among independents - that's where the Rs have to win.
 
The Democrat base isn't large enough for that to be the tipping point... yet. I believe Bernie is much more popular among independents - that's where the Rs have to win.
Oh I agree that the independent vote is the key. But when Cankles is coronated, and Bernie goes back to his Cognac and Depends, the dems will swing to her. All of them. That is what they do. It is demonstrated on here ad nauseum that the "Rs" that are disenchanted with the choices we are putting up will simple not vote or go third party. Hillary wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Oh I agree that the independent vote is the key. But when Cankles is coronated, and Bernie goes back to his Cognac and Depends, the dems will swing to her. All of them. That is what they do. It is demonstrated on here ad nauseum that the "Rs" that are disenchanted with the choices we are putting up will simple not vote or go third party. Hillary wins.

This is how it will play out. I'd be willing to put some money down in Vegas if it's Hilary v Trump she will sweep. If the Republican nominee can't capture outside votes to win the key states it doesn't matter come election day.
 
This is how it will play out. I'd be willing to put some money down in Vegas if it's Hilary v Trump she will sweep. If the Republican nominee can't capture outside votes to win the key states it doesn't matter come election day.

I think the same thing. Not exactly a sweep because red states will stay red. But, all others will be blue.
 
I apologize LG. Let me go rush to support only whomever is the party front runner, just so I can feel great about rooting for the "Super Bowl Winner"...like everyone else.

No logic. Just look at the polls, or Twitter, or Fox News, find only the Republican front runner, and defend them until the end. Every post. Every day.

Another vacuous thought from the Demobot.
 
I'm honestly not sure. Regardless of Trump wins or loses, he may have fractured the party. Rubio (one of the 5-7 most conservative senators) has been painted as an establishment RINO by this crowd solely because of his immigration stance.

They have to nominate someone who can potentially bridge the gap between the far right and moderates - that's why I think it has to be Rubio or Christie (not so much for his policies, but his bravado and temperament). Neither are a transformative politician like Obama, Reagan, or even Bill, but Hillary is so widely disliked that they can pull it off.

I dislike Christie. I like Rubio a lot.
 
I appreciate his candid way of talking and I think that's what voters want. I just can't get over his Obama love fest during the middle of the Presidential campaign. retarded

I look at that situation as he was doing his job as Governor of New Jersey. A disaster just hit and he was after the Feds money to help reconstruction. The timing was bad but that did not cost Romney the election.

Before that moment Christi received a tremendous amount of love from the Republican posters on this forum. IMO, he could have easily won the GOP nomination in 2012, refused to get in race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I look at that situation as he was doing his job as Governor of New Jersey. A disaster just hit and he was after the Feds money to help reconstruction. The timing was bad but that did not cost Romney the election.

Before that moment Christi received a tremendous amount of love from the Republican posters on this forum. IMO, he could have easily won the GOP nomination in 2012, refused to get in race.

You know people don't want to hear that. For all they care, Christie should have left the State when Obama got there.
 
Trump on Putin "It is always a great honor to be so nicely complimented by a man so highly respected within his own country and beyond."
 
The Trump/Putin dynamic would either be the best bromance ever or an absolute disaster.

Putin complimented Trump saying "He is a very outstanding person, talented, without any doubt."

Putin complimenting Trump is the equivalent of Nick Saban telling everyone how great a coach Derek Dooley is.
 
Iowa (PPP):

Rubio 48% Hillary 41%
Cruz 47% Hillary 44%
Hillary 45% Carson 45%
Hillary 45% Trump 43%
Hillary 46% Jeb 41%
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top