overseasorange2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 8,080
- Likes
- 5,969
For lord's sake, people will freak out over every little thing on here. Especially when it's something I have no control over. Get a grip people. :shakehead:
people will freak out over every little thing on here. Especially when it's something I have no control over. Get a grip people. :shakehead:
Nationdom is almost always wrong, but he's actually not mistaken here.
The Star system has been shown over time to be a tremendous predictor of probability of success.
Doesn't mean 5 stars can't bust, doesn't mean 2 stars can't be great.
Just means that 5 stars are statistically much more likely to achieve success than a 2 or 3 star.
Stars definitely matter.
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.