PowerWookie
go aaaarrrrnnngeee!!
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,605
- Likes
- 692
Denali = huge park in Alaska
Not as funny if I have to explain it.
It's ok jave. It's late.
And we won. So I am in a forgiving mood
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
.Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?
Assuming we get this guy my next concern is safety. Gaulden is too small, Griffin figures to be a LB, Jennings is set on QB and may transfer if told otherwise, Randolph and McNeil are obviously gone after 2015, so who starts opposite TK in 2016, assuming he too doesn't catch LB cancer?