InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 62,764
- Likes
- 152,460
It's all semantics. The definition of "Pro-Style" has changed and evolved. Pro-style, as WE know it, is 2 backs and a TE. Pro-stlye to kids TODAY is the Packers, Saints, Patriots, etc. The Full-back is a dying breed. The TE position has evolved into a different animal as well....see Gronk, J Graham, J Cook, etc. More snaps than ever in the pro game are coming from shotgun. Coach Jones' offense is more of the NEW pro-style offense...spread 'em out and take advantage of mis-matches.
This simply isn't true. Those teams you named don't run pro style offenses. Just because they are in the NFL doesn't make their system pro style. Just because June Jones ran the run and shoot in the NFL didn't make it a pro style. Chicago, Minnesota, and SF are examples of teams who still run a pro style. And in their offenses the FB and TEs are very relevant. I do understand what you are saying, the NFL is spreading it out more than ever. But that doesn't make those schemes pro style.
UF, SCAR, and LSU can tell you. Name how many teams are better than them. I'm interested to hear this myself.
Uhm no offense but if the man running the offense says its not then a pretty good chance it isnt. Just saying he's the coach and your a messageboard poster. Think I will believe him.
Northweastern beat an overrated MSU team who had not beaten anyone of significance all year long. LSU had that game in the bag but did what typical LSU does...choke. The only game that was truly dominated was Louisville (with 2 L's) against UF, but you can't say you didn't expect it with how UF's offense can suddenly be non existent in some games.
Once again I never said the SEC wasn't the best conference, I said that they aren't as dominate as times passed. You are too much in denial to admit it. When you let Vandy win 9 games as an SEC team, I would say it isnt as strong as the past 6 years.
Once again I never said the SEC wasn't the best conference, I said that they aren't as dominate as times passed. You are too much in denial to admit it. When you let Vandy win 9 games as an SEC team, I would say it isnt as strong as the past 6 years.
Once again I never said the SEC wasn't the best conference, I said that they aren't as dominate as times passed. You are too much in denial to admit it. When you let Vandy win 9 games as an SEC team, I would say it isnt as strong as the past 6 years.
Once again I never said the SEC wasn't the best conference, I said that they aren't as dominate as times passed. You are too much in denial to admit it. When you let Vandy win 9 games as an SEC team, I would say it isnt as strong as the past 6 years.
Any chance Vanderbilt's 9 wins this year might have been a result of ongoing improvement on their part or is it simply a result of the rest of the SEC declining?
