If dooley was such a great evaluator, why did he keep him? Vincent Dallas, Justin Coleman, Jacques Smith, Maurice Couch, Mccullers, and Sentimore were all evaluated by Dooley and all have done virtually nothing.
If dooley was such a great evaluator, why did he keep him? Vincent Dallas, Justin Coleman, Jacques Smith, Maurice Couch, Mccullers, and Sentimore were all evaluated by Dooley and all have done virtually nothing.
so all those guys hard after palardy are **** evaluators? give it a rest, man. speed and personnel played a role, but coaching and scheme was what turned our defense into liquid poopoo last season.
Offensively, you're right. Defensively, we are light years behind the elite SEC teams. Our defensive team speed is Big-10ish.
My point is that people are defending dooley's eval skills, when he wasn't a good talent evaluator. Why was Teague playing when it was a universal thought that Bonner was our best lockdown corner?
Because Bonner didnt have the mental part down. If Dooley didn't evaluate talent well, you must be ready to jump off a cliff because you must think we have WAC talent all over the field. I disagree with you sir. You can dislike Dooley but the one thing he could do is tell who could play in the SEC.
We surely don't have SEC talent on the field. Our WRs were asked who our best lockdown corner was, they said Bonner, but Dooley let Teague go out there and get torched every play.
